Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 20727
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:41 pm
 


Filibuster Cartoons
Title: The end of Palin? (click to view)
Date: October 9, 2011
So Sarah Palin shocked precisely no one this week by announcing that she would not, in fact, be running for the Republican Party's 2012 presidential nomination. Logistically speaking, her candidacy would have been completely unfeasible at this point. Due to recent machinations, it's looking like the Iowa caucus will be held as early as late December, leaving very little time for Team Palin to organize the sort of sophisticated campaign operation that would be necessary to play catch-up with the 10 other candidates who have already had months to prepare. Similarly, with so many Tea Party types already in the race, it's very unclear if a Palin candidacy would have had any natural base of support at this point. Whatever ideological novelty she once possessed has long been eclipsed by that of people like Michelle Bachmann or Herman Cain, who basically offer Palin-like views in a more attractive, articulate package.

But here I am taking Palin seriously. The actual evidence suggests that her decision to opt-out was not, in fact, strategic at all, but merely the latest stylized ritual in the former governor's long-running act of pretending to be a serious politician.

Almost every word of Mrs. Palin's official un-announcement is either disingenuous or phoney in some way. She says "family comes first" and that her life's priorities have always ranked in the order of "God, family, and country." She says this is "obvious," but anyone who has actually followed Palin's career over the last four years knows that the truly "obvious" reality is that the personal interests of Sarah Palin herself clearly outrank all three. This is the woman, lest we forget, who made the decision to run for Vice President of the United States a mere four months after giving birth to a disabled child, and knowing full well that there'd soon be another infant on the way, care of her knocked-up teenage daughter. Putting family first should mean literally that, but in her actions, Sarah Palin has given every indication that family is a mere inconvenience to be managed in the slim moments between running for office, making FOX News appearances, traveling out of state on publicity tours, and filming reality shows, rather than something serious enough to justify compromising the pursuit of any of the above.

Even more obnoxious, however, was Palin's line — which she notes she "always says" — that "one doesn't need a title" to peruse important political goals. This was the same justification she gave for abandoning her position of Governor of Alaska back in 2009, and it makes about as much sense now as it did then. The presidency of the United States is not a "title," it's the most important constitutional office in the country, and the world's most powerful position of global leadership. If she feels she's not qualified or talented enough to hold it — as the much humbler Chris Christie has been repeatedly willing to admit — then say so openly. But don't belittle the Constitution by acting as if its offices are little more than glorified beauty queen sashes.

These are all common complaints of the woman, and judging from recent polls, the vast majority of Republicans are inclined to believe that she is, at the very best, a highly flawed vessel that does more to overshadow than strengthen the causes she supposedly believes in. But her decision to not run may actually expose a darker side of the woman, too: a greed so insatiable that it crosses the line from that of a harmlessly vain gadfly to an outright grifter.

As Jon Stewart wonderfully exposed the other night, as recently as September 20, Palin was actively soliciting donations from her supporters on the explicit pretence that she was very likely to run for president. This, despite the fact that as far back as June, Bristol Palin was going around declaring that her mom "definitely" knew what her decision was going to be (ie: "no"). Putting two and to together, we can now look back at Palin's extravagant summer of "pre-campaign" bus tours, for-pay speeches, etc, as little more than a brazen attempt to syphon cash from gullible marks in order to fund the sort of glittery, high-profile lifestyle she seems to think she deserves.

As usual, it would be nice if other conservatives had the guts to point this sort of stuff out, but as it stands, only fringe outcasts like David Frum seem to have the courage. This is, I think, Mrs. Palin's single most destructive legacy. She undeniably lowered the bar of conservative discourse, dignity, and credibility to rock-bottom levels, yet was still happily propped up by a conservative media machine that found her a glamours, easy source of copy. Any conservative wanting to be taken seriously by that same machine thus had to profess a level of polite respect for Palin that she obviously did not deserve, and the whole thing became this grotesque Emperor's New Clothes situation where the truth of Palin's obvious uselessness could never be openly stated, lest one lose standing within the oppressively conformist world of the mainstream American right.

Hopefully she's done now. Her last lingering claim as a serious politician has been abandoned, making her, finally and officially, nothing more than a mere tabloid celebrity. One hopes the media will take this as a cue to begin writing Sarah Palin out of their scripts once and for all.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9392
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:51 pm
 


She will slowly fade away as being much of an anything. I found it particularly nauseating when she would use her handicapped son Trig as a prop for many of her speeches. That is why she is whoring her self out as much as possible until the fad wears off.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15078
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 7:21 pm
 


Don't count that lady out. She can work a crowd and a book tour and she can raise a great deal of cash for a cause just with her name. I wouldn't doubt she is saying no the the GOP just so she can run a third party. She would be the real tea party candidate.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18194
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:17 pm
 


I wouldn't count her out either.

It wouldn't surprise me to see her run a PAC of some sort(anyone remember Swift Boat Veterans for Truth), or hitch her wagon to another conservative candidate (either as VP or for some Cabinet position if the Republican candidate gets elected.

Just because she said she won't run as a presidential candidate doesn't mean we've heard the last of her.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17667
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:17 am
 


I think she'll stick wht the media end of things. That way she can rake it in with both hands, take command of her own schedule and be in the public eye, which she clearly likes. And more power to her if she does that. As long as she ain't the President, I wish her all the luck in the world.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3532
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:08 am
 


I really don't understand why anyone ever thought she was going to be a candidate for President. She's clearly not electable, and she's never said anything that sounded like "I want to run." Her actions are as easily explainable as political activism as "pre-campaigning." She has said that they only way she would run for office is if no one else stands up; there are at least a dozen serious Republican candidates for President, so that's clearly not the case.

I don't trust her to actually find and recognize real solutions, but her motivations are easily explained by taking her at her word: "anybody can make a huge difference in this country, without a title, without an office, just being out there as an advocate for solutions that can work to get the country on the right track. And that’s where I am now.” Why does anyone, fan or foe, imagine she's doing anything else?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 297
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:45 pm
 


I predict she'll be stumping for many 2012 tea party candidates and whoever gets the GOP presidential nomination. Her name will be everywhere in Summer 2012; she'll be the attack dog against Obama's policies so that the GOP candidate can focus on their own policies. There will be rampant speculation about her being chosen for VP again. The dinosaur media can't help but obsess over her, they have a narrative to maintain.

I don't think she will be VP or get a cabinet position, though.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 San Jose Sharks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 41576
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:22 pm
 


Newsbot wrote:
This is the woman, lest we forget, who made the decision to run for Vice President of the United States a mere four months after giving birth to a disabled child


Attacking the woman because she loved her Donws Syndrome baby enough to have it? And then the utter gall of her to have a family and a career just like the woman's movement has been saying women should do the past 100 years.

Keep it classy, you f*&%ing hypocrites. [B-o]


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18194
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:14 pm
 


BartSimpson wrote:
Newsbot wrote:
This is the woman, lest we forget, who made the decision to run for Vice President of the United States a mere four months after giving birth to a disabled child


Attacking the woman because she loved her Donws Syndrome baby enough to have it? And then the utter gall of her to have a family and a career just like the woman's movement has been saying women should do the past 100 years.

Keep it classy, you f*&%ing hypocrites. [B-o]


JJ wrote that Bart, not any of us in this thread...


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 437
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:37 pm
 


Back in the day, conservatives rightly criticized the women's movement for peddling the unrealistic idea that women could "have it all" at no cost to their families. Sarah Palin's self-serving political/media career clearly came at the expense of her family. It's not hypocritical for someone like me to observe that.


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
 New York Rangers
Profile
Posts: 51
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:48 am
 


Well I may not agree with her but Palin does have ambition if misguided. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21311
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:05 am
 


Quote:
The end of Palin!!!


Was there ever really a beginning? :?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17667
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:05 pm
 


Psudo wrote:
I really don't understand why anyone ever thought she was going to be a candidate for President. She's clearly not electable, and she's never said anything that sounded like "I want to run." Her actions are as easily explainable as political activism as "pre-campaigning." She has said that they only way she would run for office is if no one else stands up; there are at least a dozen serious Republican candidates for President, so that's clearly not the case.

I don't trust her to actually find and recognize real solutions, but her motivations are easily explained by taking her at her word: "anybody can make a huge difference in this country, without a title, without an office, just being out there as an advocate for solutions that can work to get the country on the right track. And that’s where I am now.” Why does anyone, fan or foe, imagine she's doing anything else?


Here here.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7837
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:19 pm
 


That's really to bad.

With Palin gone, Tina Fey's gonna have to get a whole new schtick. :lol:


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4492
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:52 pm
 


Freakinoldguy wrote:
That's really to bad.

With Palin gone, Tina Fey's gonna have to get a whole new schtick. :lol:

The Liz Lemon schtick seems to be working alright for her...


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.