[BartSimpson]

So a cross on public property is wrong. So are Nativity displays even on private property in many places.

But blasphemy posing as art? That's protected expression.

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/to ... -lawn.html

[andyt]

Where are crèches banned on private property?

Cross on public property is wrong unless symbols from all faiths are invited. Personally I'd rather have none.

[2Cdo]

I actually think the artist makes a good point about the commercialisation of Christmas!

[Tricks]

BartSimpson wrote:

So a cross on public property is wrong. So are Nativity displays even on private property in many places.

Why wouldn't that be allowed? That's stupid as fuck. And that's from an Atheist...

[bootlegga]

BartSimpson wrote:

So a cross on public property is wrong. So are Nativity displays even on private property in many places.

But blasphemy posing as art? That's protected expression.

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/to ... -lawn.html

Frankly, that display is hideous and should be banned because of its awfulness, not out of any sense of religion-in-public-places argument.

[BartSimpson]

bootlegga wrote:

Frankly, that display is hideous and should be banned because of its awfulness, not out of any sense of religion-in-public-places argument.

I'm thinking about doing a sculpture of a crucified Muslim to protest the commercialization of Eid. Think I can get that shown at the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art?

[bootlegga]

BartSimpson wrote:

bootlegga wrote:

Frankly, that display is hideous and should be banned because of its awfulness, not out of any sense of religion-in-public-places argument.

I'm thinking about doing a sculpture of a crucified Muslim to protest the commercialization of Eid. Think I can get that shown at the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art?

Probably, but that doesn't make it anymore right than this piece of garbage is.

[Lemmy]

BartSimpson wrote:

I'm thinking about doing a sculpture of a crucified Muslim to protest the commercialization of Eid. Think I can get that shown at the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art?

I sure hope so. That'd be worth a trip to New York City.

[Guy_Fawkes]

I see it on the same level as people who make art out of feces.

[Brenda]

BartSimpson wrote:

So a cross on public property is wrong. So are Nativity displays even on private property in many places.

But blasphemy posing as art? That's protected expression.

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/to ... -lawn.html

It ain't a gay robot skeleton by the name of Geoff Peterson dressed up as Santa, so it is not funny.

[Guy_Fawkes]

Here is some more Wisdumb from Perry....

[sandorski]

Dude just made Dubyah look like a Rocket Genius.