andyt wrote:
Yeah, and they said they would stop then, I thought.
They did:
Quote:
The report by children's representative Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond said the controversial tests should not be reinstated unless there is evidence brought to light that they work in assessing and treating young sex offenders, and only then under strict guidelines.
Children's Minister Mary McNeil said the government had no plans to bring back the tests.
Bacardi4206 wrote:
Curtman wrote:
I hope I read something wrong, and they aren't showing porn to kids.
Quote:
Worse I think they are showing child porn to kids, at least that is what I got from the article.
That's not what I got from it at all.
Quote:
For more than two decades, sex offenders as young as 13 taking part in the government program were required to look at images of nude and semi-nude children and listen to audio descriptions of forced sex while their physical responses were measured.
And they're not kids (not normal kids). They're teen sex offenders. Youth just means they're under 18 (yes, they mentioned one as young as 13. Same age as those sick little bastards in England 15 years ago, or so, that tortured, beat and sodomized a 3 year old boy they kidnapped from a mall). If I remember correctly, Kimberly Proctor's killers were both under 18. Would they be considered kids? Should any of those kids receive sympathy for this "sick" testing?
(And no - I'm neither condoning nor advocating the return of this barbaric test).
News Moderator 
(-20%) 
