Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11719
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:00 pm
 


I know most folks here are disappointed that only one Canadian-based team made the playoffs this year but the playoffs are going on anyway :lol:

Anyone interested in posting their predictions?

Round #1 match-ups:

Montreal vs Tampa
Pittsburgh vs Columbus
NY Rangers vs Philadelphia
Boston vs Detroit

San Jose vs Los Angeles
Anaheim vs Dallas
St. Louis vs Chicago
Colorado vs Minnesota


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11719
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:01 pm
 


Mine:

Montreal
Pittsburgh
NY
Boston

San Jose
Anaheim
Chicago
Colorado


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:16 pm
 


Montreal is looking really good so far.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13404
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:39 pm
 


Hockey is a religion in Montreal.


Attachments:
2D59D88C6C6D7EB9E3D6342B1329_h243_w430_m2_q80_cjRLaNXWm.jpg
2D59D88C6C6D7EB9E3D6342B1329_h243_w430_m2_q80_cjRLaNXWm.jpg [ 24.26 KiB | Viewed 900 times ]
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:09 pm
 


Round #1 match-ups:

Montreal in 5
Pittsburgh in 4
Philadelphia in 6
I think Detroit will give Boston a lot more trouble than anyone thinks.
7 games, no call.



San Jose in 7 this should be the best series
Anaheim in 5
Colorado in 4
Chicago in 7


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19982
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:36 am
 


Okay, so here's my picks for the 1st round......

Montreal over Tampa in 5
Pittsburgh over Columbus in 5
NY Rangers over Philadelphia in 6
Detroit over Boston in 7

San Jose over Los Angeles in 6
Anaheim over Dallas in 5
Chicago over St. Louis in 7
Colorado over Minnesota in 6

The only sentimental pick, the one I'm maybe not too sure about, is the Detroit vs Boston series.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19982
PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:26 pm
 


Wow, it looked like Chitown had it in the bag with their play late in the 2nd and the start of the 3rd. Took too many penalties in the 3rd and let St Louis tie it up with 7 seconds left, opening the way for the Blues to take it in OT again, at least this game was settled in the 1st OT period.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:53 pm
 


Philly and the Rangers tied at one game apiece as are Boston-Detroit.

Game 3 Habs-Tampa in a few minutes.





PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:34 pm
 


Tampa Bay got SCREWED that was a friggen goal. I can't believe they didn't check the video.


Online
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 28051
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:53 pm
 


Vive les Habs du Montreal! Vive les Canadiens! Vive le Canada! :rock:


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19982
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:00 pm
 


jj2424 wrote:
Tampa Bay got SCREWED that was a friggen goal. I can't believe they didn't check the video.



Quote:
Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper

69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise
that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the
crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be
allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking
players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances
be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking
player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s
ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an
attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a
goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact
with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when
such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the
attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.
The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice
judgement of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or
review





PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:52 am
 


This rule is based on the premise
that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the
crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be
allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking
players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances
be allowed.

There was no interference, Price even shoved him as he was trying to get out of the way.

It was appropriate.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Dallas Stars


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17720
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:06 am
 


Columbus Blue Jackets did an amazing comeback after being down 3-1 aginst the Pens. They won 4-3 in the Second OT. It's the first win ever for the Blue Jackets in the post season. They've only been around about 4 or 5 years in Columbus. I know some of the hockey fans there and they celibrated the win as if it was a win for Stanley Cup. [B-o]


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:47 pm
 


woot, 1st round down for the Canadiens. Good start.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3967
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:53 pm
 


GO HABS GO!!!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 516 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5 ... 35  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.