Richard wrote:
As a beleaguered fan yourself I see you already agree that they don't have to field a great team to make a lot of money. They simply have to add a player from time to time that will give us something to hold onto. I associate it with the "Faint Hope Clause" every fifteen years they give us hope then take it away.
You're right - i do know that whatever piece of crap Toronto puts onto the ice, it will generate money, but that doesn't mean the Leafs haven't spent money (not this year) on their roster in the past. In fact, that's the biggest slam - they were spending too much money and not getting an equal return. This team was a free-spending model, albeit with crappy results.
Quote:
To field a roster of players that could win a cup would cost millions and frankly I don't see why they would want to put out the money.
Not this year - but that's an aberration! The Leafs have always spent money on players, but they've often been overpriced, aging veterans - and this was done at the expense of their farm system and draft selections. They did spend millions - always up to the cap - and any team that dishes out the ridiculous contracts to Tucker, McCabe, Raycroft, Kubina and Blake can't be called cheap (but they can be called reckless)
Quote:
To rebuild farm teams and restructure that organization wouldn't be an overnight job. Especially when your gain would be an extra couple of months "bums" watching the game. We as fans already put out the money for everything except a Stanley Cup hat and shirt.
![Drink up [B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif)
They are slowly rebuilding, but that's got nothing to do with their old spend and hope routine. I realize in Fletcher 2.0 era that it is indeed a waste to spend up to the cap, but hopefully in a couple of years they can pull a Philadelphia and mix good drafting, good trades and spend on some quality YOUNG free-agents. It's finally a step in the right direction.