Disgusting1 wrote:
Call me crazy.
Crazy. Okay, now I'll read the rest of the post.
Disgusting1 wrote:
Imagine if everyone had a "bank" account with there own card, seperate from there personal day to day chequing and savings acount.
Where you can make money buy doig good deeds.
If there were some disagreement about whether someone's actions fit the scenario on the price list, would there be some official way to judge one way or the other? If so, wouldn't the judgement (court?) system quickly get backlogged?
There's a big difference between getting everything on tape and determining what's going on in the video.
I think your heart is in the right place, but the idea is completely impractical and impossible to implement. A better way would be for folks to watch out for their neighbors, remember their good deeds and reward them for them. Spreading around responsibility for it would make it far easier to implement. It would require people to volunteer and go out of their way to get to know and help their neighbors, but that seems to serve the same purpose; getting people to treat each other better. Feel free to give that a catchy name, make a Facebook fan page, and promote it as a movement.