[andyt]

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/101001/national/nl_hunting_death

Quote:

Justice Richard LeBlanc of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador said the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mary Beth Harshbarger recklessly breached the standard of care expected by a reasonable person in such circumstances.

Bullshit. She shot at a "black shape' in semi-darkness in the direction she knew her husband would be returning to the vehicle. If shooting at something you can't identify isn't criminal negligence, what is? No wonder hunters get a bad reputation.

And she took up with her husband's brother after the killing.

[DerbyX]

rants-raves-f12/the-dumbest-generation-t91995.html

This thread already exists.

[PublicAnimalNo9]

Yeesh

[andyt]

For some reason the title isn't the one I meant to paste here. If you click on the link or read the quote I gave, you will see it's a completely different topic. Don't really know how this happened, since I didn't have that title on my clip board.

[DerbyX]

andyt wrote:

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/101001/national/nl_hunting_death

Quote:

Justice Richard LeBlanc of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador said the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mary Beth Harshbarger recklessly breached the standard of care expected by a reasonable person in such circumstances.

Bullshit. She shot at a "black shape' in semi-darkness in the direction she knew her husband would be returning to the vehicle. If shooting at something you can't identify isn't criminal negligence, what is? No wonder hunters get a bad reputation.

And she took up with her husband's brother after the killing.

The thread title doesn't match the story.

[PublicAnimalNo9]

Sorry andy..that "yeesh" was directed at the court decision, not what Derby pointed out

[andyt]

That's ok, I deserve a yeesh for this, tho I can't figure out how it happened.