[stopharperregim]

Do you want to stop the Harper Regime?
Or are you content to just complain about what you are not willing to change?

It is my opinion that the Harper regime did not earn a majority government. It is my opinion that the election was cheated. I believe that a significant number of people voted in a riding other then their riding of ordinary residence as to cheat the election. This criminal act carries a jail term and a fine.


The Harper regime has a majority by 13 seats, the vote difference in the closest 13 ridings were 4635 votes. If more then 4635 of the 14,000,000 people that voted, committed this act, then it is possible. With the present system it will be cheated in next Election.

If you want to understand how to cheat the Canadian election system go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sennr_y02Ro


I am asking, that you ask for the following information from Elections Canada. I have requested it but to date it has not been provided to me. Perhaps you could be more successful.

Can you ask them for this information please?
Elections Canada: haff@parl.gc.ca
Please bcc me : info@votemoving.com


Once you have sent the email, please post this message back to the wall where you got it from so others can do the same.



To start I would like to know the following about sdr voters;
How many people same day registered voters (Sdr Voters) there were. People who registered to vote on the day they voted.
How many sdr voters were there in the May Election?
How many sdr voters were there in the past previous 3 elections?
How many seats in the last 3 elections were won by 1000 votes or less?
How many seats in the May election were won by 1000 votes or less?
How many of those seats previously won by 1000 votes or less were in rural areas
How many of those seats previously won by 1000 votes or less were in densely populated areas.
How many sdr voters were previously registered to vote in riding 150 kilometers away or less?
Which sdr voters are card members of the Conservative Party?
Of the sdr voters who were card members of the conservative party which documentations were used?
How many of the sdr voters were bankers or lawyers or multiple property owners?
In which riding were the sdr voters originally registered to vote?
Which sdr voters were originally registered to vote in a blow out riding?
What documentation for sdr voters was provided?
Which polling stations did the sdr voters vote in? Close to the riding boundary border or far away from the riding boundary. (If one is going to drive to the next riding to vote, one is not going to drive across the riding but would be likely to vote close to the riding border. Gas is expensive)
Which sdr voters were previously registered to vote in dead heat ridings?



Once you have sent the email, please post this back to the wall where you got it from so that other concerned Canadian’s such as yourself can take the initiative as well.
Thank You
Cheers
Steven

[jeff744]

Crap like this makes other anti-Harpers look bad, get lost.

[martin14]

jeff744 wrote:

Crap like this makes other anti-Harpers look bad, get lost.

well said Jeff

[Thanos]

Quote:

Do you want to stop the Harper Regime?

Nope, so fuck off.

[ShepherdsDog]

fucking spanner.

[stopharperregim]

Well must respond to this thread. First off, about the spelling mistake, I do not make fun of you because you can not add or count, so please do not make fun of me because I can not spell.
Secondly, I must say that I am lied to by politicians on a daily basis as a Canadian, and I realize that people lie. The point being is that numbers do not lie. So bring me the numbers and not the b.s.

If anyone on may 2nd, owned two properties in two ridings, they could have easily gone to one of the many websites posting the ridings that were meant to be tight raced, taken their electric bill from the second property, along with their drivers licence and went into a polling station and registerd to vote in that riding. Taking a vote from a blow out riding and placing it into a tight raced riding.

The fact that this is a crime, means that there will be a natural crime rate. The fact that websites promoted this action, and that the government did nothing to inform the people it is a crime or took any measures (scan documents) to stop it would lead an intelligent person to conclude that the natural rate of this crime may have increased. Remember if one person committed this crime in a riding, then by law, a bi-election must be called.

4635 people are not required to cause 13 bi-elections.

I am really not interested in people laughing at me or telling me they think an idiot, as I mentioned, people lie. I am really only interested in reviewing the numbers to see to what extent the rate increased.

Bring me the numbers, the numbers tell all.

[RUEZ]

stopharperregim wrote:

Well must respond to this thread. First off, about the spelling mistake, I do not make fun of you because you can not add or count, so please do not make fun of me because I can not spell.
Secondly, I must say that I am lied to by politicians on a daily basis as a Canadian, and I realize that people lie. The point being is that numbers do not lie. So bring me the numbers and not the b.s.

If anyone on may 2nd, owned two properties in two ridings, they could have easily gone to one of the many websites posting the ridings that were meant to be tight raced, taken their electric bill from the second property, along with their drivers licence and went into a polling station and registerd to vote in that riding. Taking a vote from a blow out riding and placing it into a tight raced riding.

The fact that this is a crime, means that there will be a natural crime rate. The fact that websites promoted this action, and that the government did nothing to inform the people it is a crime or took any measures (scan documents) to stop it would lead an intelligent person to conclude that the natural rate of this crime may have increased. Remember if one person committed this crime in a riding, then by law, a bi-election must be called.

4635 people are not required to cause 13 bi-elections.

I am really not interested in people laughing at me or telling me they think an idiot, as I mentioned, people lie. I am really only interested in reviewing the numbers to see to what extent the rate increased.

Bring me the numbers, the numbers tell all.

We lived through the Chretien years you can suck it up and live through the Harper years.

[Lemmy]

RUEZ wrote:

We lived through the Chretien years you can suck it up and live through the Harper years.

Yeah, how did we ever manage to make it through the greatest period of economic growth and stability in our nation's history?

[RUEZ]

Lemmy wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

We lived through the Chretien years you can suck it up and live through the Harper years.

Yeah, how did we ever manage to make it through the greatest period of economic growth and stability in our nation's history?

So in other words" Here's five dollars Canadian taxpayer. There's more where that came from as long as you stay bent over and close your eyes."

[fifeboy]

Lemmy wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

We lived through the Chretien years you can suck it up and live through the Harper years.

Yeah, how did we ever manage to make it through the greatest period of economic growth and stability in our nation's history?

[PublicAnimalNo9]

Lemmy wrote:

RUEZ wrote:

We lived through the Chretien years you can suck it up and live through the Harper years.

Yeah, how did we ever manage to make it through the greatest period of economic growth and stability in our nation's history?

Cuz Brian Mulroney set the stage for the Liberal's amazing miracle









...dammit, another post I couldn't make it through with a straight face

[EyeBrock]

stopharperregim wrote:

Well must respond to this thread. First off, about the spelling mistake, I do not make fun of you because you can not add or count, so please do not make fun of me because I can not spell.
Secondly, I must say that I am lied to by politicians on a daily basis as a Canadian, and I realize that people lie. The point being is that numbers do not lie. So bring me the numbers and not the b.s.

If anyone on may 2nd, owned two properties in two ridings, they could have easily gone to one of the many websites posting the ridings that were meant to be tight raced, taken their electric bill from the second property, along with their drivers licence and went into a polling station and registerd to vote in that riding. Taking a vote from a blow out riding and placing it into a tight raced riding.

The fact that this is a crime, means that there will be a natural crime rate. The fact that websites promoted this action, and that the government did nothing to inform the people it is a crime or took any measures (scan documents) to stop it would lead an intelligent person to conclude that the natural rate of this crime may have increased. Remember if one person committed this crime in a riding, then by law, a bi-election must be called.

4635 people are not required to cause 13 bi-elections.

I am really not interested in people laughing at me or telling me they think an idiot, as I mentioned, people lie. I am really only interested in reviewing the numbers to see to what extent the rate increased.

Bring me the numbers, the numbers tell all.

Bi-elections?

Is that for people that vote both ways?

[DanSC]

If you want to stop the Harper Regime, try for a vote of no-confidence. If that doesn't work and democracy has been compromised in Canada, I'm sure the Queen will step in.

[andyt]

I do want to stop the Harper regime. As soon as a viable alternative presents itself. By that time the CPC will be ready to collapse anyway with the build up of corruption charges and arrogance, the way the Libs did before them. This may take longer than I can hold my breath tho.

[dino_bobba_renno]

So all I have to do to make sure the party I want gets elected is buy like 10 or 15 houses in different ridings. Man who would of thought it would be that easy.