CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18649
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:11 am
 


Quote:
Leticia Sarmiento was a modern-day slave, working 16 hours a day, seven days a week as a nanny for a wealthy family in British Columbia, said the Crown as it urged a judge to hand down a sentence for her former employer that will deter others from trafficking vulnerable women.

Franco Yiu Kwan Orr was found guilty in June of human trafficking for bringing Sarmiento with his family to Canada, where she earned $500 a month to care for his three children.

"He kept her as a virtual slave in his home," Crown lawyer Peter La Prairie told the B.C. Supreme Court Judge Richard Goepel on Wednesday. "It was a crime of greed and it was a crime of control."

In 2007, Sarmiento, 40, began working for the family in Hong Kong, where, she told the court, conditions were very different.

A mother of three herself, Sarmiento testified that she was told by the couple before coming to Canada that she would continue to have two days off a week and regular working hours. She said they told her she could become a permanent resident of the country after two years, and her children could join her here.

Orr brought Sarmiento to Canada in September 2008 on a visitor's visa that expired after six months.

Living in Metro Vancouver, she said she was not allowed to socialize with other people, worked seven days a week, had her passport taken away, and had to share a room with the couple's youngest daughter.

Nanny feared deportation, human trafficking trial told

In June 2010, after 22 months, Sarmiento called 911 and police took her to a women's shelter.

'I feel judged,' victim tells court

In a victim impact statement read in court by La Prairie, Sarmiento said she wanted a better life but has now lost trust in people.

"I'm a good mother, a good daughter. I never do bad things. I help people and I expect the same back," La Prairie read aloud.

She said she believed her children would join her in Canada.

"I have not seen my children since 2007 when I left the Philippines and went to Hong Kong," the statement said. "In 2010 I stopped having income to send home, so my kids stopped going to school."

Her youngest daughter accused her of not being able to even recognize her in photos, she said, and the media attention from the case has caused her embarrassment and made it difficult to find another job.

"I feel judged," she said.

La Prairie said Orr used deception to get Sarmiento into the country, subjected her to degrading and humiliating conditions once here, and did so for his own profit — all aggravating factors for sentencing.

He cited a study on the trafficking of women for domestic servitude, and said they are among the most vulnerable in the world.

First conviction under Immigration Act

According to RCMP, there have been 45 convictions in Canada for human trafficking or related crimes, involving 69 people, but Orr's is the first conviction for human trafficking under the Immigration Act.

Orr was also found guilty of employing a foreign national illegally and misrepresenting the situation to immigration officials. His partner, Oi Ling Nicole Huen, was found not guilty by a jury.

'The only thing we are guilty [of] is being too soft-hearted,' wife says
Defence lawyer Nicholas Preovolos suggested a conditional sentence for Orr, 50, a father of three without a criminal record.

Preovolos said his client — who worked at one time as an immigration consultant, according to the Crown — maintains his innocence on the charge of human trafficking.

If the jury believed the conditions in the home were as deplorable for Sarmiento as she testified, they would have convicted Orr's spouse of human trafficking, as well, for being complicit in the exploitation, he said.

"Mrs. Sarmiento did have serious credibility problems," Preovolos told the court, pointing out discrepancies in her testimony about working hours, her access to a cellphone, whether her passport was taken away and whether she was locked in the house.

Filipina nanny human trafficking claims disputed
"To me, it looks like she embellished the evidence or outright perjured herself."

Preovolos said his client may have been paying Sarmiento Hong Kong wages in Canada, but "it is a very limited profit motive."

The maximum sentence for the human trafficking charge is life in prison.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-c ... ncing.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18097
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:17 am
 


nasty


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 San Jose Sharks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42573
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:28 pm
 


So was she a 'virtual slave' or an actual slave? I'm sure lots of people at Wal Mart can call themselves 'virtual slaves' so virtual slave status isn't all that damining to me.

Now, if she was an actual slave, that'd be different.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4304
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:59 pm
 


My wife befriended a Filipino woman who was working as a live in nanny about year ago. Very similar story, she had to work 7 days a week and was basically on call 24 hours a day and did everything from taking care of the kids, yard work, house cleaning, taking care of the family pet and even helping with home renovations. All that for a measly $700 a month *According to the people she worked for she made more than that but that was her take home after they deducted “rent”, groceries and her share of the utilities :| .

The one commonality that strikes me the most between this story and what she was going through is the attitudes of the people they worked for. In both cases their employers thought they were somehow doing them a favour and that they actually should have been thankful for basically being treated as slaves which is evident by the following quote:
Quote:
'The only thing we are guilty [of] is being too soft-hearted,' wife says

That’s basically the same type of reaction that well to do couple had when my wife’s friend finally got fed up and left. Unreal.

I can’t help but wonder how much of this type of thing goes on in Canada.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.