[andyt]

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opi ... le2321815/

Read it if you're interested. It's summed up by:

Quote:

The petroleum economist Chris Skrebowski defines peak oil as the point at which “the cost of incremental supply exceeds the price economies can pay without destroying growth.” We’re likely much closer to that kind of peak than most people, including Mr. Yergin, acknowledge.

[1Peg]

andyt wrote:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/our-peak-oil-premium/article2321815/

Read it if you're interested. It's summed up by:

Quote:

The petroleum economist Chris Skrebowski defines peak oil as the point at which “the cost of incremental supply exceeds the price economies can pay without destroying growth.” We’re likely much closer to that kind of peak than most people, including Mr. Yergin, acknowledge.

What does saving the rain forests, peak oil and global warming all have in common?

[Psudo]

1Peg wrote:

What does saving the rain forests, peak oil and global warming all have in common?

Vague, disputed definitions?

[1Peg]

Psudo wrote:

1Peg wrote:

What does saving the rain forests, peak oil and global warming all have in common?

Vague, disputed definitions?

No, they are all a front for fighting capitalism. Right andy?

[andyt]

1Peg wrote:

Psudo wrote:

1Peg wrote:

What does saving the rain forests, peak oil and global warming all have in common?

Vague, disputed definitions?

No, they are all a front for fighting capitalism. Right andy?

Oh, right, raze the forests, suck up all the oil we can and spew it back out, or you're a commie. That

Quote:

Thomas Homer-Dixon is director of the Waterloo Institute for Complexity and Innovation and CIGI Chair of Global Systems at the Balsillie School of International Affairs in Waterloo, Ont.

is one fer sairtain.