[ridenrain]

I believe some people have worked very hard to prove they deserve them and the medals serve as a warning to others.
.. actually, I don't really care but now that I came out on the one side, the flood of opposite views are sure to follow.

[QBC]

Thats right, it has been brought up several times...so enough already.

[ShepherdsDog]

QBC wrote:

Thats right, it has been brought up several times...so enough already.

[stream]http://www.ilovewavs.com/Effects/People/Applause.wav[/stream]

[kaetz]

the next who brings it up will deserve a nomination for the annoying! LOL

[Canadaka]

It's worth considering, or having them as none nominating medals. Meaning only admin can give them out.

I am open to hearing what the majority think.

[Scape]

Nix em. Mods have the power to award their own 'medals' anyway.

[kaetz]

My say would be keep it as it is...
I don't see any harm to the forums in having them! And making only admin responsible for giving them out would mean less fun for us and more work for you! Although you could allow nominating and discussing and then based on it decide to give the medal or not... that would be a sort of compromise...

[danikyvor]

I personally don't see a problem with the negative medals...but I do have a problem with people trying to nominate themselves for it. ahem.

[Regina]

Scape wrote:

Nix em. Mods have the power to award their own 'medals' anyway.

No we have to be nominated just like everyone else. The only one we get is the RCMP medal because we "police" the site. The forum rules determine who get any others despite our personal opinion.

[fire_i]

Flamer and Anti-Canuck are two I wouldn't mind being removed, but I always saw Annoying as more of a joke than anything else. Guess I'm the only one with that point of view, though.

Whichever I guess.