BartSimpson wrote:
As to the rest of the people in Canada, nowhere does the Charter award you any property rights. You therefore have no rights to property at all, merely privileges that exist at the whim of your government. All land is therefore Crown land.
Great a constitutional lawyer.
Ok let start at the begining.
Their is no set constitutional provision for the protection of property, true. However, the courts as empowered by the constitution have followed some/most of British Common Law which as a mass of laws established interpritations does provide a from of protection for property.
Quote:
Therefore, natives are the only people in Canada who actually own their property be that property land, cars, structures, or personal possessions.
Incorrect and misleading. Their is no stated protection for the confiscation of propert or even a well established standard of what property is. (Most of the confusion on what property is, is over somewhat questionable things like mining rights, quotas or legal operation.) But real items like property [land] and belongings are well defined as property, and confiscation while not constitutionaly prohibitied, is required to include compensation.
People do own their property.
Quote:
The rest of you have no specified property rights and can be deprived of anything by government process, decree, or even fiat as there is no right to contest the deprivation of a right that is not acknowledged in the first place.
True in enough way to be correct that I'l let it pass, but remember that while they can take it way they must also compensate you for it.
The suggestion that non natives do not own property is silly, misleading, wrong and deseptive.