[ziggy]

lily wrote:

Quote:

This Eviction Notice gives these churches 72 hours to remove their belongings from the nearly three hundred buildings owned and operated by them in Squamish territory, which encompasses all of Vancouver and the north shore and outlying territories. After this three day period, Chief Kiapilano and his allies will peacefully occupy and take over these buildings, and open them as sanctuaries for homeless and hungry people.

The Squamish don't "own" all of Vancouver, although they do own nice chunks of the North Shore and "outlying territories". In order to legally evict the churches, they'll have to prove/settle their claims, and so far as I know, they haven't done so.


They also own the land where Park Royal is situated... why didn't they include the mall in the eviction notice?

Shut the mall down? Unthinkable.

[commanderkai]

Who wants to kill some Indians again? I'm more than up to it

[Mustang1]

"Finally, it is the aim of this campaign to bring to justice those persons responsible for the crime against humanity known as the Indian Residential School system, and therefore we will be establishing Indigenous Courts of Justice on Squamish Nation territory where those accused of such crimes will be brought for trial and sentencing. "

I'm waiting to see how this little move works. What kind of power will this have over the Charter?

Oh...and there wasn't any genocide either. Thanks for the revisionist nonsense.

[ziggy]

Three of the Innuit I worked with got a cash settlement and all three said they were glad they got taken to the city and got an education.All three said they will take the cash though,a bit more than 30 grand each.

[westmanguy]

commanderkai wrote:

Who wants to kill some Indians again? I'm more than up to it

Not. Cool.

Although many Natives (not all) have some really silly issues, but please...don't go to that.

[Mustang1]

three wrote:

lily wrote:

Quote:

This Eviction Notice gives these churches 72 hours to remove their belongings from the nearly three hundred buildings owned and operated by them in Squamish territory, which encompasses all of Vancouver and the north shore and outlying territories. After this three day period, Chief Kiapilano and his allies will peacefully occupy and take over these buildings, and open them as sanctuaries for homeless and hungry people.

The Squamish don't "own" all of Vancouver, although they do own nice chunks of the North Shore and "outlying territories". In order to legally evict the churches, they'll have to prove/settle their claims, and so far as I know, they haven't done so.


They also own the land where Park Royal is situated... why didn't they include the mall in the eviction notice?


Also - I bet each of the churches does more to help the homeless and hungry than the whole Squamish Nation put together.

Aboriginal and Treaty Rights exist on traditional land, whether land claims are settled yet or not. Land claims are about outright ownership, Aboriginal Title, whereas traditional lands are always subject to Aboriginal Rights. This means some say in development and use of the land, and revenue sharing. Apparently Chief Kiapalano does not agree with the Churches using the land any more.

And how exactly is he going to enforce, "we will be establishing Indigenous Courts of Justice on Squamish Nation territory where those accused of such crimes will be brought for trial and sentencing"?

[Mustang1]

three wrote:

Mustang1 wrote:

three wrote:

lily wrote:

Quote:

This Eviction Notice gives these churches 72 hours to remove their belongings from the nearly three hundred buildings owned and operated by them in Squamish territory, which encompasses all of Vancouver and the north shore and outlying territories. After this three day period, Chief Kiapilano and his allies will peacefully occupy and take over these buildings, and open them as sanctuaries for homeless and hungry people.

The Squamish don't "own" all of Vancouver, although they do own nice chunks of the North Shore and "outlying territories". In order to legally evict the churches, they'll have to prove/settle their claims, and so far as I know, they haven't done so.


They also own the land where Park Royal is situated... why didn't they include the mall in the eviction notice?


Also - I bet each of the churches does more to help the homeless and hungry than the whole Squamish Nation put together.

Aboriginal and Treaty Rights exist on traditional land, whether land claims are settled yet or not. Land claims are about outright ownership, Aboriginal Title, whereas traditional lands are always subject to Aboriginal Rights. This means some say in development and use of the land, and revenue sharing. Apparently Chief Kiapalano does not agree with the Churches using the land any more.

And how exactly is he going to enforce, "we will be establishing Indigenous Courts of Justice on Squamish Nation territory where those accused of such crimes will be brought for trial and sentencing"?

There is volunteer International assistance standing by.

AND HOW WILL THIS BE ENFORCED?!?!?!?

[saturn_656]

The Churches should tell the Chief and his henchman Kevin Pipsqueak to take a long walk off a short pier or "Back under your bridge trolls, you have no power here!"

Either will work for me.

[saturn_656]

Mustang1 wrote:

three wrote:

Mustang1 wrote:

three wrote:

lily wrote:

Quote:

This Eviction Notice gives these churches 72 hours to remove their belongings from the nearly three hundred buildings owned and operated by them in Squamish territory, which encompasses all of Vancouver and the north shore and outlying territories. After this three day period, Chief Kiapilano and his allies will peacefully occupy and take over these buildings, and open them as sanctuaries for homeless and hungry people.

The Squamish don't "own" all of Vancouver, although they do own nice chunks of the North Shore and "outlying territories". In order to legally evict the churches, they'll have to prove/settle their claims, and so far as I know, they haven't done so.


They also own the land where Park Royal is situated... why didn't they include the mall in the eviction notice?


Also - I bet each of the churches does more to help the homeless and hungry than the whole Squamish Nation put together.

Aboriginal and Treaty Rights exist on traditional land, whether land claims are settled yet or not. Land claims are about outright ownership, Aboriginal Title, whereas traditional lands are always subject to Aboriginal Rights. This means some say in development and use of the land, and revenue sharing. Apparently Chief Kiapalano does not agree with the Churches using the land any more.

And how exactly is he going to enforce, "we will be establishing Indigenous Courts of Justice on Squamish Nation territory where those accused of such crimes will be brought for trial and sentencing"?

There is volunteer International assistance standing by.

AND HOW WILL THIS BE ENFORCED?!?!?!?

Now there is another band of idiots that have no power here, "international volunteers" trying to set up kangaroo courts.