[Mustang1]

mtbr wrote:

once again you ignore the other partisan post in this thread to point out mine..you never change.

Yours was still "partisan" - tattling won't alter it.

[Mustang1]

mtbr wrote:

kenmore wrote:

Rednecked tories can dish it out but they cant take it... delusional Ruez... face it when the country goes to the polls the tories will be out on their ass.. oh ya

oh look wheres M1 to complain about this one

I don't need to as others cowardly use the rep system to do complaining.

[hurley_108]

mtbr wrote:

hurley_108 wrote:

Personally, I think that the person who submitted a story should be barred from making the first comment.

Those who are 100 percent innocent shall cast the first stone.

What, just because I've done it means I'm not allowed to propose that it be barred? I'd be happy to relinquish that ability as it would make the news system much more difficult to abuse.

[mtbr]

hurley_108 wrote:

mtbr wrote:

hurley_108 wrote:

Personally, I think that the person who submitted a story should be barred from making the first comment.

Those who are 100 percent innocent shall cast the first stone.

What, just because I've done it means I'm not allowed to propose that it be barred? I'd be happy to relinquish that ability as it would make the news system much more difficult to abuse.

than start a poll or make a new thread...don't just sit there complaining about it like a typical socialist do something.

[Mustang1]

mtbr wrote:

than start a poll or make a new thread...don't just sit there complaining about it like a typical socialist do something.

If only "socialists" complain, then you, comrade, need to get yer' Marx on!

[ridenrain]

I'm still wondering what Mustang is looking for us to comment about.
It's a phone poll of 1000 people asking questions we don't know, we rely on the polling company to tell us the results and the paper to report them fairly.
Based on the above house of cards, you'd like us to try and prove their wrong?

I have it on just as accurate and reliable information that 76.39% think differently, 9 times out of 10 on the same ouiji board that the Libs talked to Cadman on.

[mtbr]

The "centrist" is just on another one of his anti-conservative rants.

[Mustang1]

ridenrain wrote:

I'm still wondering what Mustang is looking for us to comment about.
It's a phone poll of 1000 people asking questions we don't know, we rely on the polling company to tell us the results and the paper to report them fairly.
Based on the above house of cards, you'd like us to try and prove their wrong?

I don't know, say, what it means? How it translates electorally? What, if any, evidence you possess to suggest it's not accurate? How's it's relevant to the current Canadian political climate? Historically, how does this impact voters?

Anything other than the banal, parroted, mindless, partisan hackery that only comes from those that actually know very little about Canadian politics. And, no, Xeroxing an online blog, article, wiki, google doesn't render you knowledgeable.

[Mustang1]

mtbr wrote:

The "centrist" is just on another one of his anti-conservative rants.

You have no idea what "centrist" means, do you?

[ridenrain]

Don't forget to include that he "dosen't belong to any political party"..

[mtbr]

Mustang1 wrote:

mtbr wrote:

The "centrist" is just on another one of his anti-conservative rants.

You have no idea what "centrist" means, do you?

Somebody who won't cheer for any team because he's scared of losing

[Mr_Canada]

I find it funny that all people do here nowadays is laugh at other people's posts, mock them, claim they are poor posts, but never actually debating.

It's kinda a non-progressive technique pretty much every active member on CKA does at most points.

[ridenrain]

Mustang1 wrote:

ridenrain wrote:

I'm still wondering what Mustang is looking for us to comment about.
It's a phone poll of 1000 people asking questions we don't know, we rely on the polling company to tell us the results and the paper to report them fairly.
Based on the above house of cards, you'd like us to try and prove their wrong?

I don't know, say, what it means? How it translates electorally? What, if any, evidence you possess to suggest it's not accurate? How's it's relevant to the current Canadian political climate? Historically, how does this impact voters?

Anything other than the banal, parroted, mindless, partisan hackery that only comes from those that actually know very little about Canadian politics. And, no, Xeroxing an online blog, article, wiki, google doesn't render you knowledgeable.

Isn't it the job of the person making the claim to prove the point, or has it suddenly become acceptable to simply post an aticle and run away? Shouldn't derby or you, since you're taking a side, be proving to us skeptics how this poll was accurate and reflects the views of the voters?

[Mustang1]

mtbr wrote:

Mustang1 wrote:

mtbr wrote:

The "centrist" is just on another one of his anti-conservative rants.

You have no idea what "centrist" means, do you?

Somebody who won't cheer for any team because he's scared of losing

Dropout translation: you have no idea.

[Mustang1]

Mr_Canada wrote:

I find it funny that all people do here nowadays is laugh at other people's posts, mock them, claim they are poor posts, but never actually debating.

It's kinda a non-progressive technique pretty much every active member on CKA does at most points.

Good point - i've challenged many here to actually debate ideological politics in a Canadian context, but all they can do is whine, bitch, dodge and make goof-off excuses. This is a cut n' paste culture, bereft of any actual political understanding. It's too bad because there are some pretty bright people here with interesting views, but i'm sure they're frustrated with the mindless political tribalism