[lily]

You're comparing male and female circumsisions?

[Arctic_Menace]

[Tracker]

lily wrote:

You're comparing male and female circumsisions?

Yes, and so are you.

[lily]

Tracker wrote:

lily wrote:

You're comparing male and female circumsisions?

Yes, and so are you.

No, I'm not. They're not comparable.

[Blue_Nose]

How do you know they aren't comparable if you don't compare them?

[lily]

Blue_Nose wrote:

How do you know they aren't comparable if you don't compare them?

All right. They're comparable in the same way a broken nail is to a severed foot.

[Tracker]

Blue_Nose wrote:

How do you know they aren't comparable if you don't compare them?

haha, exactly.

[Tracker]

lily wrote:

All right. They're comparable in the same way a broken nail is to a severed foot.

So a bit of extra skin taken off a giney is like a broken nail and skin taken off a penis is like a severed foot. ok, gotchya.

[Robair]

Tracker wrote:

Robair wrote:

What are you bringing home?

I poach cowgirls from Saskatchewan.

Then you deserve what you get.

Pffft, cowgirls. Farmer's daughters are where it's at.

If you're arguing male vs female circumsisions, they aren't even close. What they do to the girls is way worse.

Not that it has anything to do with the article. In the article it's a procedure that grown adults are signing up for and paying for. Not something done to them without consent when they're children.

[Tracker]

Robair wrote:

:lol:

Tracker wrote:

Robair wrote:

What are you bringing home?

I poach cowgirls from Saskatchewan.

Then you deserve what you get.

A burning sensation when I pee?

Robair wrote:

If you're arguing male vs female circumsisions, they aren't even close. What they do to the girls is way worse.

Not that it has anything to do with the article. In the article it's a procedure that grown adults are signing up for and paying for. Not something done to them without consent when they're children.

Well, if you and lily are bringing clit removal into this, that's twisting it. That's not what this article is about. Completely different. That would be like having the entire end of a dink sliced off.

[Robair]

Tracker wrote:

Well, if you and lily are bringing clit removal into this, that's twisting it. That's not what this article is about. Completely different. That would be like having the entire end of a dink sliced off.

That's what female circumsision is.

None of what you and Lily are talking about has anything to do with the article. Circumsision isn't in the article anywhere. The article is about cosmetic procedures that adult women are getting.

[lily]

Exactly. Which is why I questioned why he brought it up in the first place.

[ziggy]

Cheaper then surgery.

[Tracker]

Robair wrote:

Tracker wrote:

Well, if you and lily are bringing clit removal into this, that's twisting it. That's not what this article is about. Completely different. That would be like having the entire end of a dink sliced off.

That's what female circumsision is.

None of what you and Lily are talking about has anything to do with the article. Circumsision isn't in the article anywhere. The article is about cosmetic procedures that adult women are getting.

Actually, I stayed with the point of the article exactly. lily decided to twist it when she found it difficult to differentiate between having male foreskin removed and having female labia skin removed. She wants having labia removed to seem profoundly more hazardous and detrimental than having foreskin removed. Which basically, they're the same thing and end with similar results. Both in my opinion need not to take place as we're born with these body parts for a reason. Right?

[Tracker]

lily wrote:

Exactly. Which is why I questioned why he brought it up in the first place.

Bullshit and you know it.