[Streaker]

Ahhh.... Stop yer whining....

[RUEZ]

Streaker wrote:

Ahhh.... Stop yer whining....

Streakers done. I repeat, grow up.

[Ripcat]

Semantics...

[hurley_108]

Just call them the conservative party. With a small c, it's entirely accurate, but as a description rather than a name.

[mtbr]

and when the Alberta Liberal party becomes the Alberta Party (coming soon)we'll just have to remember to attach the BIG L to their name.

[RUEZ]

I've heard people describe the BC Liberals as more conservative than liberal. Shall we just call them the Conservative party as well? Let's just call the Bloc the Conservatives as well, then we can lump all of their shit in too. And who cares that this is a provincial party, as long as they have the same ideology let's just lump them all in together, it helps you guys bad mouth the Conservatives.

[Saskanna]

i "former Reform members"!

I think not. Former Devine Conservatives and disenchanted Saskatchewan Liberals and people like myself fed up to the teeth with the mismanagement of this Province by the NDP.

Cutting the fat from top heavy government programs is why Wall(Sask Party) was elected. These services can be delivered in a different way that will not affect the benefits but will cut some of the administrative costs from government. Good move IMO. The Sask Party is on the right track. Get rid of the deadwood.

[westmanguy]

You Sask New Democrats are totally deluded.

Given, Brad Wall is a Federal Conservative, but did you know the Deputy Leader of the Saskatchewan Party is a Federal Liberal?

The Saskatchewan Party is a coalition of anti-NDP people in the province, including BOTH Federal Liberals and Federal Conservatives.

It came out of the collapse of the Saskatchewan Progressive Conservatives under Divine, but many many SP'ers are Liberals.

Its a centrist moderate party.

[Toro]

In other words, they canceled a program few used that was less than a year old.

The NDP sure were mean-spirited for not implementing the program the previous 15 years in government.

[FuBaR]

Few is still soe though. And with the massive surpluses facing the government this fiscal year, generally as a result to the incredible oil demand, why not keep the program running?

Oh and cutting the fat isn't why the Sask Party was elected. Change for the sake of change was one of the definite themes of the last election.

[RUEZ]

FuBaR wrote:

Few is still soe though. And with the massive surpluses facing the government this fiscal year, generally as a result to the incredible oil demand, why not keep the program running?

Oh and cutting the fat isn't why the Sask Party was elected. Change for the sake of change was one of the definite themes of the last election.

For 77 people? Doesn't sound like a good program to me.