| |
| Author |
Topic Options
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:57 pm
"The pretext is false, because it isn't about the economy, because no one will be taking care of it for the next several weeks." Dumont accused, "He has closed up shop. He's putting the National Assembly up on blocks." The whole story stirs my shit further as Charest also showed of his campaign bus emblazoned with his 'new' slogan... "OUI". Read more, I want to know what Quebec thinks!
|
Posts: 192
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:37 pm
On one side I am pissed because they say the economy is in trouble so we spend millions on an election.
Then again they claim they need a majority government to be able to manage the economic crisis properly instead of having several and making it tougher to come to conclusions and get things done.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:43 pm
Charest est un menteur. Il préfère aller en élection maintenant que dans quelques mois, alors que l'économie sera davantage vascillante et que son gouvernement deviendrait impopulaire par la même occasion.
Appeler les élections maintenant c'est néamoins risqué pour Charest, il risque de se faire devancer par Pauline.
|
Posts: 935
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:44 pm
Dans le système actuel, c'est la prérogrative du Premier Ministre de déclencher les élections quand bon lui semble. D'autres premiers ministres l'ont fait antérieurement. Ce n'est pas mentir, c'est connaître ses capacités et en profiter.
|
Posts: 14886
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:52 pm
I'm surprised more people aren't complaining about this considering the drubbing Harper got for the same thing.
|
Posts: 8561
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:54 pm
RUEZ wrote: I'm surprised more people aren't complaining about this considering the drubbing Harper got for the same thing. Did Charest pass a fixed election dates law? No, so shut up.
|
Posts: 3375
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:10 pm
Marc01 wrote: Charest est un menteur. Il préfère aller en élection maintenant que dans quelques mois, alors que l'économie sera davantage vascillante et que son gouvernement deviendrait impopulaire par la même occasion.
Appeler les élections maintenant c'est néamoins risqué pour Charest, il risque de se faire devancer par Pauline. Ta pauvre ''vache'' au PQ considere que le PLQ est quand meme pas si pire que ca. Marois s'inspire des annonces libérales
|
Posts: 3375
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:23 pm
Here is an article in English. Marois is the one responsible for current Health Care situation, while she was the minister in the previous PQ regime. Marois comment on health careQuote: PQ leader Pauline Marois told The Gazette she had no regrets about retiring thousands of medical staff, causing vast shortages of doctors and nurses. Quote: With health care becoming the dominant issue in the campaign, Charest lay the blame for long hospital waits as well as a shortage of family doctors squarely on Marois's shoulders.
|
Posts: 14886
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:04 pm
hurley_108 wrote: RUEZ wrote: I'm surprised more people aren't complaining about this considering the drubbing Harper got for the same thing. Did Charest pass a fixed election dates law? No, so shut up. Fuck you peon. A lot of people gave Harper a hard time for calling an election when apparently no one wanted one. No surprise you'd be on here acting like an ass.
|
Posts: 8561
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:17 pm
RUEZ wrote: hurley_108 wrote: RUEZ wrote: I'm surprised more people aren't complaining about this considering the drubbing Harper got for the same thing. Did Charest pass a fixed election dates law? No, so shut up. Fuck you peon. A lot of people gave Harper a hard time for calling an election when apparently no one wanted one. No surprise you'd be on here acting like an ass. Ooo, I seem to have hit a nerve. 
|
Posts: 14886
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:22 pm
hurley_108 wrote: Ooo, I seem to have hit a nerve.  No, you wanna be rude then you'll get it back. If you act like an adult I'll return the favour.
|
Posts: 12647
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:28 pm
RUEZ wrote: hurley_108 wrote: Ooo, I seem to have hit a nerve.  No, you wanna be rude then you'll get it back. If you act like an adult I'll return the favour. yeah, grow up Mr. Poopypants.
|
Posts: 8561
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:30 pm
RUEZ wrote: hurley_108 wrote: Ooo, I seem to have hit a nerve.  No, you wanna be rude then you'll get it back. If you act like an adult I'll return the favour. Bring a comment that's more than just "Waaah, it's not fair, you beat up on our guy for being a dick and now you're not beating up that other guy who's following our lead. Waaah!" I guess it's time for: 
|
Posts: 14886
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:42 pm
hurley_108 wrote: Bring a comment that's more than just "Waaah, it's not fair, you beat up on our guy for being a dick and now you're not beating up that other guy who's following our lead. Waaah!" I guess it's time for:  You got all that from this: Quote: I'm surprised more people aren't complaining about this considering the drubbing Harper got for the same thing. I guess you really are an idiot. Come back when you can act your age.
|
Posts: 7646
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:49 pm
L'élection au Québec est nécessaire, comme le gouvernement fédéral le gouvernement du Québec est dysfonctionnel. M. Charest a besoin d'un mandat clair
|
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 32 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
|