[OnTheIce]

Brenda wrote:

OnTheIce wrote:

Brenda wrote:

He is just a fucking asshole, who has a huge problem with his own popularity and doesnt realize how good he has it with a wife that does everything for him and accept everything but cheating?

I guess its hard for a man to keep your dick in your pants when you live a jet set life, and have nothing else to worry about than where the next available babe will be.

Don't think you're being sexist? Give your head a shake.

You just assume because he's cheated on her that she's been the perfect wife who does everything for him anytime he wants....but of course, she won't tolerate cheating.

You don't have a clue about their relationship but don't hesitate to throw him under the bus and put her up on a pedestal simply due to the fact that she's female.

Yeehaa! I was waiting for this one!

You have no clue either, yet you defend him. Aren't you a bit sexist? Just because she's been cheated on, she probably deserved it? Simply because she is a female?

Typical sexist female response.

Who's defending him?

I didn't. Read it again. I know it'll be hard to see beyond your bias.

I simply noted that you threw him under the bus and put her on a pedestal without knowing anything. She's the perfect wife who did everything and he's the asshole cheater.

I never stated my stance, nor was it my point to defend anyone.

FWIW, I don't respect any man or woman who cheats on their spouse.

[Brenda]

sexist female huh. Right. Give your head a shake dude. You know nothing.

Seriously, you obviously missed a bit of sarcasm. A woman who bangs the face of her husband in, is not realyy innocent, is she

God, it must be great to be so damned ignorant.

[OnTheIce]

Brenda wrote:

sexist female huh. Right. Give your head a shake dude. You know nothing.

Seriously, you obviously missed a bit of sarcasm. A woman who bangs the face of her husband in, is not realyy innocent, is she

God, it must be great to be so damned ignorant.

Speaking of ignorant.....

She "banged his face in"?

Gotta love the allegations you throw out there, still pretending you have a clue.

[Brenda]

OnTheIce wrote:

Brenda wrote:

sexist female huh. Right. Give your head a shake dude. You know nothing.

Seriously, you obviously missed a bit of sarcasm. A woman who bangs the face of her husband in, is not realyy innocent, is she

God, it must be great to be so damned ignorant.

Speaking of ignorant.....

She "banged his face in"?

Gotta love the allegations you throw out there, still pretending you have a clue.

Ah. So the scratches in his face were from the kitten?

[OnTheIce]

Brenda wrote:

OnTheIce wrote:

Brenda wrote:

sexist female huh. Right. Give your head a shake dude. You know nothing.

Seriously, you obviously missed a bit of sarcasm. A woman who bangs the face of her husband in, is not realyy innocent, is she

God, it must be great to be so damned ignorant.

Speaking of ignorant.....

She "banged his face in"?

Gotta love the allegations you throw out there, still pretending you have a clue.

Ah. So the scratches in his face were from the kitten?

Scratches?

I thought she "banged" his face in?

And you know the scratches are from his wife how? Perhaps a branch cut his face? Perhaps slamming into a tree and hydrant would cause some physical damage?

Again, more assumptions.....nothing factual. More exaggerations to make your point.

Perhaps it's time to quit while you think you're ahead.

[Brenda]

I take it you haven't read the follow ups? She admitted she hit him. About 5 times...

[Scape]

Should have been 9...

[Brenda]

Scape wrote:

Should have been 9...

Wood

[BluesBud]

Brenda wrote:

Scape wrote:

Should have been 9...

Wood

Had to be an Iron. I somehow doubt she will be giving him wood for sometime to come.

[Brenda]

BluesBud wrote:

Brenda wrote:

Scape wrote:

Should have been 9...

Wood

I somehow doubt she will be giving him wood for sometime to come.

I would like to see he has 9

[OnTheIce]

Brenda wrote:

:lol: I take it you haven't read the follow ups? She admitted she hit him. About 5 times...

Source?

Doesn't appear on any source I've seen.

[Brenda]

I read it in one of the many tiger threads on here, my google search only ended up in 20 pages of forums and joke-sites. I was too lazy to look further.

[Brenda]

Here's one that claims it was a domestic dispute
http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=52154

I can't find the one that I mean.

[Regina]

Brenda wrote:

:lol: I take it you haven't read the follow ups? She admitted she hit him. About 5 times...

Hope she replaced her divot..........apparently she's not the only one playing that course. That's just good golf etiquette.

[Brenda]

Meh, the funny thing is that OnTheIce read one post, and decided to bitch about it without reading the rest of the thread. Gunnair asked the same thing (well, he ASKED, OTI accused) while this had been covered on page 1 already. Oh well.

This whole thread is a waste of time anyway.


So, Big R, when are you going to teach me how to play? Golf, that is