First off Doug....don't take Adam's opinion as every ones opinion. Also good luck trying to get him to show facts.......he rarely does
In regards to the states being corrupt, I would have to agree with Adam slightly. Companies do give millions to both parties and they usually get it back in new contracts or through some laws.
Look at Bush and the steel tariffs fiasco. The WTO was telling him that the tariffs steel were illegal. Bush in the mean time seemed to be delaying any talks to overcome the issue. During this Bush was in the steal capital of the United States, Pittsburgh. He was getting millions of dollars form the steel companies who were making more money everyday Bush decided to leave the tariffs imported Steel.
The following article was written on December 1, 2003:
Washington Post article
Quote:
The WTO's ruling against the tariffs was finalized three weeks ago,
Quote:
Tomorrow he flies to Pittsburgh, headquarters of U.S. Steel Corp., which is the nation's largest domestic steel producer and led efforts to pressure the administration to retain the tariffs. Bush is going there for a fundraiser for his campaign. One of the organizers is Thomas J. Usher, U.S. Steel's chairman and chief executive.
So Bush delayed the reversal of his illegal tariffs for his trip to Pittsburgh. The steal companies gained an extra few million because of this. Then companies like U.S> Steel Corp. 'donate' money to Bush and his campaign.
I don't care what you call this, it's not right. When someone has the power to make laws that will affect a companies revenues that company should not be allowed to donate money to that person or his/her political party. It's wrong weather you call it soft money or bribery.
One last thing, Bush finally decided to put an end to the tariffs on December 4, 2003. Only 2 days after his big fundraiser in Pittsburgh.
I strongly doubt that this was a coincidence.