Toro wrote:
Here is their list of the Happiest Countries on Earth
No, it isn't. If you want the happiest people, you can just look at the left column (satisfaction) and ignore the others, which gives a completely different result.
The "environmental footprint" column is the only part of it which differs from other lists like this which various organizations have done. This transforms the whole thing from an overall happiness & wellbeing study to an
efficiency study: who keeps people happiest for the amount of resources they consume. Which is an interesting idea. But they fail to come up with any trend which shows WHY the results are as they are, which makes it not very useful -- there's no lesson, no route to improving efficiency.
Something which I learned in a sociology class back before disco was dead, was that people tend to be happy when they are doing about as well as their neighbours, assuming that their neighbours aren't starving refugees. So you look at a country like Cuba, where almost everyone is poor, but where they have nationalized healthcare (giving them a high life expectancy), and you end up with a top-10 score in this study. Barring a major war, plague or other disaster, an egalitarian but poor society with freely available health care will always have a very high score.
And that's where this study falls down. It fails to note something which anybody who took even one soc class in the last 50 years should know -- that, all else being equal, people who make $20,000 a year in a $50,000 a year society will be less happy than those who make $3000 in a $2000 a year society. If you know that, then you already know more than their study can tell you.