CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26878
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:39 pm
 


http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national ... 60331.html

First you have Canadian judge saying that pedophillic literature has artistic merit, another justifies a pedophillic act because the little girl(under 6 yrs of age) was sexually aggressive and now this. You really have to wonder about those people sitting on the benches. Unfortunately in Canada there is no one to judge the judges.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6151
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:24 pm
 


ShepherdsDog wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/03/31/internet-luring060331.html

First you have Canadian judge saying that pedophillic literature has artistic merit, another justifies a pedophillic act because the little girl(under 6 yrs of age) was sexually aggressive and now this. You really have to wonder about those people sitting on the benches. Unfortunately in Canada there is no one to judge the judges.


Seize their computers, I would not be surprised if some incriminating stuff was found.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2279
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:54 pm
 


I think this is a case of no harm was done YET!!! and the judge had no choice because it wasn't luring, At THAT POINT!!!! But clearly legislators must review the law to ensure it covers at least the phone call, and It should certainly cover lieing about ones age.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17114
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:18 pm
 


What the Fark?!?!?!


Sexually aggressive 6 year old?!

Pedophillic language has artistic merit?!?!



Did this guy mix alcohol, hydromorphone, mushrooms and weed altogether and go to work?

And take it from me, that is not a good mix to have, damn near dangerous.....



Dakwa jahain Naesassani!!!!!! :roll:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26878
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:46 pm
 


Three different judges. If it was just one you'd think they were merely an abberation, but if you look closely at other cases involving sexual deviants and the rulings made, the trends seems a little disturbing. Those appointed as guardians of society seem to have have become derelict in their duty, servants of the letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law. It's time that Canada adopted a system where judges and parole boards were more accountable for their descisions. If not, then the flock needs to find some of their own dogs to guard against the wolves.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14094
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:52 pm
 


Shouldn't the parents be responsible for allowing their children to get on these chatrooms, and willingly participate in this dirty talk? Not to excuse the acts of these creeps, but I wouldn't wait around for the government to protect my kids from this sort of thing... not unless they shut down the internet entirely.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2031
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:09 pm
 


Probably the prosecutor charged the guy with the wrong crime....

If he didn't try to lure the kid, then you can't convict him on it....Should have charged with sexual harrasment or some other crime....Isn't there a law about obscenity?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10908
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:23 pm
 


There should be a law where they have post the names and addy's of these POS, so we can take matters into our own hands, and that would be that.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2279
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 5:38 am
 


Quote:
but if you look closely at other cases involving sexual deviants and the rulings made


First off the law isn't designed to prosecute sexual deviants but to protect children. Second, if you can't stretch the law for the Hell's Angles who murder and steal, pimp, sell chrystal meth and herioine to kids, then why would you be able to in this case?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8878
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:33 am
 


But if the judge had overstepped the bounds of the law, then he would have been an "activist judege", right hwanker?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10908
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:48 am
 


xerxes wrote:
But if the judge had overstepped the bounds of the law, then he would have been an "activist judge", right hwanker?


Like letting them go free with 3 years probation, yep it would.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 996
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:11 pm
 


Some of you might find this interesting:
Save the Children


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26878
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:43 pm
 


Quote:
If that's hard to believe, reading what Stephen Boone has to say may be even harder.

Now living in Winnipeg, he's been convicted three times for sexually assaulting children, some as young as eight years old.

Boone insists it's the children who want to have sex with him.

"Children would like to be sexual if they were allowed to," he says. "They're just politically repressed, repressed to the point where it actually kills them, to the point where it's almost fanatical. It's like a religion. You're not allowed to say it could be possible that some children like sex and would have sex if they could."

He doesn't see children as victims. "Because they tend to be open. Children seem to be so amazingly open to that experience. That is what causes the problems for me. People see children who take an interest in me as unnatural and suspicious."

If Boone is convicted a fourth time, he could be declared a Dangerous Offender and put in jail indefinitely.


What the hell is wrong with the justice system?? This guy is allowed to get away with these acts three times and has been released after each one? But if he gets caught a fourth time he MAY be declared a dangerous offender. This should have happened the first time. Self admittedly he sees nothing wrong with having sexual content with children and has refused to partake in counselling. The fucks that have allowed this POS to be released to reoffend need to be severely censured as well, as they are part of the problem too. If one of their cases reoffends then they should worry about consequences they may face as a result of their actions.

Quote:
One of the tasks at the Toronto Police Child Exploitation Section is checking up on people convicted, or charged, with offences against children to make sure they stick to their conditions of release.

It should be routine, but it often turns out to be an exercise in frustration. In many cases, conditions of release or bail are changed by the courts, but the police aren't told.

"This is ridiculous," says Detective Constable Stefan Mueller. We have to have a say in the bail variations. There's got to be a hearing."

You're not supposed to be out walking around and going around and do whatever you want, but that's what it's come down to," Says Detective Ian Lamond.

"They know that we don't have the resources to go check them every day," says Detective Constable Paul Krawczyk. "So they know the chances of getting caught are slim to none."

Just keeping track of pedophiles is hard enough. Getting them locked up in the first place is even tougher.

"I can simply say I'm way past frustrated," says Detective Sergeant Paul Gillespie. "The fact that child abuse itself is not dealt with properly. These are children that are destroyed. Their souls are destroyed. They'll never live up to their full potential. Their lives are wrecked. And that someone might do this out of pleasure and go to jail for one or two years or one or two months, I don't understand it."


If the police are lacking the resources, then perhaps these creatures can be monitored by members of the public. I for one would be quite happy to 'check up' on these individuals, if the police would give their names and addresses. Recidivism would cease to be a concern for the populace and law enforcement in general.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2279
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:24 am
 


Quote:
What the hell is wrong with the justice system?? This guy is allowed to get away with these acts three times and has been released after each one? But if he gets caught a fourth time he MAY be declared a dangerous offender. This should have happened the first time.


i wouldn't say the first time likely second though.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 71733
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:28 am
 


ShepherdsDog wrote:
I for one would be quite happy to 'check up' on these individuals,



Why do i get the feeling that the "problems" would cease to exist entirely..... :wink:

Not that that would be a BAD thing.....


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.