CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30438
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:24 am
 


MeganC wrote:
Public_Domain wrote:
every user you're talking to has been here for almost a decade, or more.


I've been on here 4 years and I still feel new!

New and Shiney! :D


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 20991
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 10:39 am
 


The Australians refer to the Jehovah Witnesses as Godbotherers. This guy was kind of teh global warming equivalent. Please open your IPCC Report to the Book of Hansen, Verse 14.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11964
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:01 am
 


Zipperfish wrote:
The Australians refer to the Jehovah Witnesses as Godbotherers. This guy was kind of teh global warming equivalent. Please open your IPCC Report to the Book of Hansen, Verse 14.


Climate Fundamentalism is the new religion. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11400
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:31 pm
 


MeganC wrote:
sandorski wrote:
MeganC wrote:
Were you? Because to me it looks like your idea of debate is to call other people stupid because they don't agree with your way of looking at science. I don't know much about science but I have five kids and I know a lot about when one of them isn't being nice to the others.


Don't try to turn this back on him. He came posting reasonable arguments and he got dismissed with Ad Homs and accusations of Trolling. He started with a legit position, got Trolled without one attempt at a counter position. That he responds in kind is just fitting in with the crowd.

If the Users of this forum just want to chase New Members off or existing Members of opposing viewpoints off it will dwindle to nothing.


I don't care if he has arguments or opinins but he comes here and opens up all these global warming topics and tries to shut down the debate instead of having a debate and that's what's wrong.


He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11964
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:44 pm
 


sandorski wrote:
He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?


Hypocrite fail. :roll:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11400
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:51 pm
 


2Cdo wrote:
sandorski wrote:
He was the only one who attempted debate or more accurately, he certainly made an attempt, but most of what he got in return was contempt for trying. If his eventual joining the opposition in nonsense is a mark against him, what of those who started with it?


Hypocrite fail. :roll:


kk


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 4  5  6  7  8



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.