CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6151
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:27 pm
 


sandorski wrote:
grainfedprairieboy wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
One things for sure, the whole "Momentum Shifting" crowd are busy across the net making thread after thread about it. Unfortunetly for them it's all just wishful thinking.

When you guys realize that Science isn't a popularity/political contest, come back with a mind willing to accept Truth, not create it.


And what truth would that be? The version put out by the "lets rip off all we can" Kyoto con artists.

Sorry don't buy it. (pun intended)


The Evidence.


What evidence, the same evidence I alluded to above.


Visit a Science website and get all you need.




All of the above are noted and actual scientists along with another 20,000 or so climatologists who signed a petition against your perceptions. What makes you think that you are smarter then them? Al Gore the politician? David Suzuki the activist?

The ones who actually ignore the evidence are those who advocate climate change based on man induced emissions of CO2 whose evidence is patently and purely false.

Climatologists who believe CO2 causes climate change are actually in the minority. The solid majority is found in the media, in the activist groups and increasingly in government.

I suggest you do a little more research and you might even discover that activists no longer call it global warming as the planet actually hasn't changed temperature so hotter, colder, windier, wetter, drier it is now exclusively called climate change with a rider always implying it is man induced.

And BTW, if you actually believe that CO2 causes climate change you are an asshole if:

you heat your home or use lights;
support immigration of peoples from warmer climates to Canada;
drive a vehicle or take public transportation;
consume any product beyond the most basic;
buy a computer which is a tremendous initial waste of energy and consume even more power by going online telling others to green up instead of you because you believe this activity is destroying the planet yet continue your ungreen lifestyle.

For Shame

[bash] [moon]


weak and pathetic, do you actually believe a word you type?


Wotsa matter....truth hurts what old chap.

Which points in GFPB's post are not factual? I supposed you also believed the Y2K fiasco.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8545
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:58 pm
 


PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
grainfedprairieboy wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
One things for sure, the whole "Momentum Shifting" crowd are busy across the net making thread after thread about it. Unfortunetly for them it's all just wishful thinking.

When you guys realize that Science isn't a popularity/political contest, come back with a mind willing to accept Truth, not create it.


And what truth would that be? The version put out by the "lets rip off all we can" Kyoto con artists.

Sorry don't buy it. (pun intended)


The Evidence.


What evidence, the same evidence I alluded to above.


Visit a Science website and get all you need.




All of the above are noted and actual scientists along with another 20,000 or so climatologists who signed a petition against your perceptions. What makes you think that you are smarter then them? Al Gore the politician? David Suzuki the activist?

The ones who actually ignore the evidence are those who advocate climate change based on man induced emissions of CO2 whose evidence is patently and purely false.

Climatologists who believe CO2 causes climate change are actually in the minority. The solid majority is found in the media, in the activist groups and increasingly in government.

I suggest you do a little more research and you might even discover that activists no longer call it global warming as the planet actually hasn't changed temperature so hotter, colder, windier, wetter, drier it is now exclusively called climate change with a rider always implying it is man induced.

And BTW, if you actually believe that CO2 causes climate change you are an asshole if:

you heat your home or use lights;
support immigration of peoples from warmer climates to Canada;
drive a vehicle or take public transportation;
consume any product beyond the most basic;
buy a computer which is a tremendous initial waste of energy and consume even more power by going online telling others to green up instead of you because you believe this activity is destroying the planet yet continue your ungreen lifestyle.

For Shame

[bash] [moon]


weak and pathetic, do you actually believe a word you type?


Wotsa matter....truth hurts what old chap.

Which points in GFPB's post are not factual? I supposed you also believed the Y2K fiasco.


It would be far easier for you or him to point out any Factual part of that tripe he posted.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6151
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:01 pm
 


No, you called it 'tripe' proof please.......


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4097
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:08 pm
 


sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
grainfedprairieboy wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
One things for sure, the whole "Momentum Shifting" crowd are busy across the net making thread after thread about it. Unfortunetly for them it's all just wishful thinking.

When you guys realize that Science isn't a popularity/political contest, come back with a mind willing to accept Truth, not create it.


And what truth would that be? The version put out by the "lets rip off all we can" Kyoto con artists.

Sorry don't buy it. (pun intended)


The Evidence.


What evidence, the same evidence I alluded to above.


Visit a Science website and get all you need.




All of the above are noted and actual scientists along with another 20,000 or so climatologists who signed a petition against your perceptions. What makes you think that you are smarter then them? Al Gore the politician? David Suzuki the activist?

The ones who actually ignore the evidence are those who advocate climate change based on man induced emissions of CO2 whose evidence is patently and purely false.

Climatologists who believe CO2 causes climate change are actually in the minority. The solid majority is found in the media, in the activist groups and increasingly in government.

I suggest you do a little more research and you might even discover that activists no longer call it global warming as the planet actually hasn't changed temperature so hotter, colder, windier, wetter, drier it is now exclusively called climate change with a rider always implying it is man induced.

And BTW, if you actually believe that CO2 causes climate change you are an asshole if:

you heat your home or use lights;
support immigration of peoples from warmer climates to Canada;
drive a vehicle or take public transportation;
consume any product beyond the most basic;
buy a computer which is a tremendous initial waste of energy and consume even more power by going online telling others to green up instead of you because you believe this activity is destroying the planet yet continue your ungreen lifestyle.

For Shame

[bash] [moon]


weak and pathetic, do you actually believe a word you type?


Wotsa matter....truth hurts what old chap.

Which points in GFPB's post are not factual? I supposed you also believed the Y2K fiasco.


It would be far easier for you or him to point out any Factual part of that tripe he posted.


Your like debating a Muslim who can't believe that his adversary would dismiss that absolute fact that it is in the Koran. The problem is that "fact" is still based on faith.

The onus is on you to prove that man-induced CO2 has caused the earth to warm as there is absolutely positively no hard proof of such. Until you can prove this as fact you are basing your assumption of faith.

(Prove first that man induced CO2 causes warming
Prove second that the earth as a whole has actually warmed. )

Here are a few more myths and facts from the Friends of Science (I dare you to prove these 10 common faith based myths as correct, otherwise STFU):

MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.

FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects").

There has been no catastrophic warming recorded.



MYTH 2: The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature increase for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.

FACT: Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.

The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.



MYTH 3: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.

FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.



MYTH 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.
FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. While the minor gases are more effective as "greenhouse agents" than water vapour and clouds, the latter are overwhelming the effect by their sheer volume and – in the end – are thought to be responsible for 60% of the "Greenhouse effect".

Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention this important fact.


MYTH 5: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming.

FACT: Computer models can be made to "verify" anything by changing some of the 5 million input parameters or any of a multitude of negative and positive feedbacks in the program used.. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming are incapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is a major cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all the time, This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspots can be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperature of the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solar radiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which control cloud cover.

MYTH 6: The UN proved that man–made CO2 causes global warming.

FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are:
1) “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.”
2) “No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes”

To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming.


MYTH 7: CO2 is a pollutant.
FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in 100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously. Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic and noxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politically control it.


MYTH 8: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes.

FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. Regional variations may occur. Growing insurance and infrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result of increasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasing population density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting.


MYTH 9: Receding glaciers and the calving of ice shelves are proof of global warming.

FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growing and then retreating. It’s normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation as on temperature.


MYTH 10: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.

FACT: The earth is variable. The western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer, due to unrelated cyclic events in the Pacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder. The small Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica is getting warmer, while the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling. Ice thicknesses are increasing both on Greenland and in Antarctica.

Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.

I dare you to prove these 10 common faith based myths as correct.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 123
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:09 pm
 


Wullu wrote:
I love the use of the term skeptics. All good scientists are skeptics. It's how they come up with new ideas.


As an accountant I always have a sceptical eye to my work and the global warming thing does not add up. If someone were telling me that their cyclical cost trends were suddenly affected by an abnormal influence while the trend itself stayed within historic norms I'd be calling the revenue to report a probable embezzler or tax cheat. That's how I look at the global warming thing is I don't see why this cyclical trend is different from any other trend except that someone says a new influence is causing it. But on the surface it is still a trend within historic norms. Global warming is real but the part about man causing it is unfounded. The numbers just don't show an abnormal trend. The numbers actually show a gradual change if you view the averages over the past ten millenia and the charts I always see are very selective about their start and end points where the authours almost always start their charts at the point at which a cooling period ended and then the climate rebounds like after the 1888 volcano.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8545
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:59 pm
 


grainfedprairieboy wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
grainfedprairieboy wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
PluggyRug wrote:
sandorski wrote:
One things for sure, the whole "Momentum Shifting" crowd are busy across the net making thread after thread about it. Unfortunetly for them it's all just wishful thinking.

When you guys realize that Science isn't a popularity/political contest, come back with a mind willing to accept Truth, not create it.


And what truth would that be? The version put out by the "lets rip off all we can" Kyoto con artists.

Sorry don't buy it. (pun intended)


The Evidence.


What evidence, the same evidence I alluded to above.


Visit a Science website and get all you need.




All of the above are noted and actual scientists along with another 20,000 or so climatologists who signed a petition against your perceptions. What makes you think that you are smarter then them? Al Gore the politician? David Suzuki the activist?

The ones who actually ignore the evidence are those who advocate climate change based on man induced emissions of CO2 whose evidence is patently and purely false.

Climatologists who believe CO2 causes climate change are actually in the minority. The solid majority is found in the media, in the activist groups and increasingly in government.

I suggest you do a little more research and you might even discover that activists no longer call it global warming as the planet actually hasn't changed temperature so hotter, colder, windier, wetter, drier it is now exclusively called climate change with a rider always implying it is man induced.

And BTW, if you actually believe that CO2 causes climate change you are an asshole if:

you heat your home or use lights;
support immigration of peoples from warmer climates to Canada;
drive a vehicle or take public transportation;
consume any product beyond the most basic;
buy a computer which is a tremendous initial waste of energy and consume even more power by going online telling others to green up instead of you because you believe this activity is destroying the planet yet continue your ungreen lifestyle.

For Shame

[bash] [moon]


weak and pathetic, do you actually believe a word you type?


Wotsa matter....truth hurts what old chap.

Which points in GFPB's post are not factual? I supposed you also believed the Y2K fiasco.


It would be far easier for you or him to point out any Factual part of that tripe he posted.


Your like debating a Muslim who can't believe that his adversary would dismiss that absolute fact that it is in the Koran. The problem is that "fact" is still based on faith.

The onus is on you to prove that man-induced CO2 has caused the earth to warm as there is absolutely positively no hard proof of such. Until you can prove this as fact you are basing your assumption of faith.

(Prove first that man induced CO2 causes warming
Prove second that the earth as a whole has actually warmed. )

Here are a few more myths and facts from the Friends of Science (I dare you to prove these 10 common faith based myths as correct, otherwise STFU):

MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.

FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects").

There has been no catastrophic warming recorded.



MYTH 2: The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature increase for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.

FACT: Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.

The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.



MYTH 3: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.

FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.



MYTH 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.
FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. While the minor gases are more effective as "greenhouse agents" than water vapour and clouds, the latter are overwhelming the effect by their sheer volume and – in the end – are thought to be responsible for 60% of the "Greenhouse effect".

Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention this important fact.


MYTH 5: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming.

FACT: Computer models can be made to "verify" anything by changing some of the 5 million input parameters or any of a multitude of negative and positive feedbacks in the program used.. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming are incapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is a major cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all the time, This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspots can be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperature of the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solar radiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which control cloud cover.

MYTH 6: The UN proved that man–made CO2 causes global warming.

FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are:
1) “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.”
2) “No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes”

To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming.


MYTH 7: CO2 is a pollutant.
FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in 100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously. Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic and noxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politically control it.


MYTH 8: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes.

FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. Regional variations may occur. Growing insurance and infrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result of increasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasing population density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting.


MYTH 9: Receding glaciers and the calving of ice shelves are proof of global warming.

FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growing and then retreating. It’s normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation as on temperature.


MYTH 10: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.

FACT: The earth is variable. The western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer, due to unrelated cyclic events in the Pacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder. The small Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica is getting warmer, while the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling. Ice thicknesses are increasing both on Greenland and in Antarctica.

Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.

I dare you to prove these 10 common faith based myths as correct.


1) Wrong. 0.6-0.8 degrees increase within 100 years is not "mild" by anyone's measure. It is quite dramatic

2) O'Rly

3) Not a Myth, but a Fact. CO2 is definitely a GHG. Yes, as Temperatures increase, Natural CO2 releases also increase. The Naturally released CO2 has the same affect on Temperatures/Climate as the Artificially released CO2, it causes more warming.

4) CO2 is regarded as the worst GHG not because of its' Volume(though Volume is important), but because of the difficulty in removing it from the Atmosphere. It takes Natural Cycles Centuries to re-store a released CO2 molecule. This is unlike other GHGs which cycle through the atmosphere in as little as a few days for some up to 4-5 decades for others.

5) Of course Models don't "prove" anything. Who said they do? They are useful for making Predictions based upon what we know though. The more accurate the Predictions prove, the more reliable one can assume the Models are. So far the Predictions have been fairly accurate and we have been witnessing firsthand dramatic changes to Climate.
Solar Activity?

6) ???

7) Any Gas in too high a concentration is a Pollutant. Your point is Moot.

8) Watch.

9/10) No one denies the Earth is Warming. Or do they?

Light reading.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
 Montreal Canadiens
Profile
Posts: 355
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:39 pm
 


Go to my blog, Global Warming Killed the Dinosaurs!

http://www.canadaka.net/blog/CanadianGigolo

OPINIONS WELCOMED :wink: [popcorn] Sammy


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5740
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:15 pm
 


WHAT WARMING?

See NASA's corrected figures and then come back and tell me...

WHAT WARMING?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 San Jose Sharks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30248
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:44 pm
 


hurley_108 wrote:
Whatever you need to tell yourself.


There you go. When these people were saying things you liked their credentials were impressive and their theories were sound science.

Now that they're saying things you don't like you dismiss them out of hand.

Not very scientific of you to summarily dismiss scientific debate. :lol:



And that's because you people are starting to lose the debate.





So now that you're losing the debate on this ginned-up crisis I wonder what excuse will you people come up with now that will require Western Civilization to destroy itself for you?


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
 Anaheim Ducks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 747
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:39 am
 


hurley_108 wrote:
Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Yup, that about sums up your foundation for believing in man-made global warming. I think Al Gore is the best catalyst for the change in thinking. More and more real scientists are reconsidering their position after listening to that nutjob.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5740
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:35 am
 


Wind energy facts

Typical of this hysteria is this popular endorsement of wind energy by the alarmists.

As RR has pointed out the alarmists like Suzuki know the truth, because they needed it to concoct their lies. Rightous indignation and arbitrary dismissal of counter evidence seems the hall mark of the activists,

What to buy a windmill?


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Previous  1  2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.