| |
Mr_Canada
CKA Uber
Posts: 11253
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:18 am
I really don't expect America to collapse, since I've sorta been hearing about it since I was like, 4. "The USA is about to fall apart".
Though, if and when it does, I have some plans in order.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 12602
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:30 am
Mr_Canada wrote: I really don't expect America to collapse, since I've sorta been hearing about it since I was like, 4. "The USA is about to fall apart".
Though, if and when it does, I have some plans in order. Fair enough. This article is mainly making the point that if a collapse comes, it might be sudden and drastic, not gradual as most people assume. It cites Russia as a recent example. And, here we are 20 years later and they seem to have pulled themselves together a bit. So maybe it will be the same for the US. Mostly their global military reach collapsing. What are those plans of yours - cabin in the mountains, bomb shelter?
|
Posts: 3971
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:44 am
andyt wrote: Mr_Canada wrote: I really don't expect America to collapse, since I've sorta been hearing about it since I was like, 4. "The USA is about to fall apart".
Though, if and when it does, I have some plans in order. Fair enough. This article is mainly making the point that if a collapse comes, it might be sudden and drastic, not gradual as most people assume. It cites Russia as a recent example. And, here we are 20 years later and they seem to have pulled themselves together a bit. So maybe it will be the same for the US. Mostly their global military reach collapsing. What are those plans of yours - cabin in the mountains, bomb shelter? Why would Canadians need to run for the hills?
|
Mr_Canada
CKA Uber
Posts: 11253
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:02 pm
andyt wrote: Mr_Canada wrote: I really don't expect America to collapse, since I've sorta been hearing about it since I was like, 4. "The USA is about to fall apart".
Though, if and when it does, I have some plans in order. Fair enough. This article is mainly making the point that if a collapse comes, it might be sudden and drastic, not gradual as most people assume. It cites Russia as a recent example. And, here we are 20 years later and they seem to have pulled themselves together a bit. So maybe it will be the same for the US. Mostly their global military reach collapsing. What are those plans of yours - cabin in the mountains, bomb shelter? Revolution, marches, etc. I mean, I won't to beat around the bush, it's sorta going to be a good day. A lot of things to do.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 12602
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:07 pm
saturn_656 wrote: Why would Canadians need to run for the hills? Because if the US collapses, we'll get pulled down with them. They may go after our resources with their still strong military, or if things get really bad, many of those yahoos with guns down there may decide their chances are better here. Or just the economic aspect, as their economy falls apart, so will ours. Or just if Steven Harper wins a majority.
|
Posts: 3971
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:16 pm
andyt wrote: saturn_656 wrote: Why would Canadians need to run for the hills? Because if the US collapses, we'll get pulled down with them. They may go after our resources with their still strong military, or if things get really bad, many of those yahoos with guns down there may decide their chances are better here. Or just the economic aspect, as their economy falls apart, so will ours. Or just if Steven Harper wins a majority. If the US truly collapses the country will fracture. Canada would be better off making alliances with whatever entity comes out of the northern states rather than sticking our heads in the proverbial sand.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 12602
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:36 pm
saturn_656 wrote: andyt wrote: saturn_656 wrote: Why would Canadians need to run for the hills? Because if the US collapses, we'll get pulled down with them. They may go after our resources with their still strong military, or if things get really bad, many of those yahoos with guns down there may decide their chances are better here. Or just the economic aspect, as their economy falls apart, so will ours. Or just if Steven Harper wins a majority. If the US truly collapses the country will fracture. Canada would be better off making alliances with whatever entity comes out of the northern states rather than sticking our heads in the proverbial sand. That's assuming Canada doesn't fracture as well. On the west coast we've always looked south, so Pacifica might become a reality in that case.
|
Posts: 3971
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:39 pm
andyt wrote: That's assuming Canada doesn't fracture as well. On the west coast we've always looked south, so Pacifica might become a reality in that case. The only thing worse than one balkanized North American country is?
|
Posts: 12756
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:05 pm
andyt wrote: Fair enough. This article is mainly making the point that if a collapse comes, it might be sudden and drastic, not gradual as most people assume. It cites Russia as a recent example. And, here we are 20 years later and they seem to have pulled themselves together a bit. So maybe it will be the same for the US. Mostly their global military reach collapsing. Global military reach collapsing? What are you talking about? Whether or not you want to acknowledge it, US military reach is stronger than that of the next three or four nations combined (say China, the UK, Russia and France) and two of those four are US allies. US military reach is not fading one iota. Each day it extends it reach, not contracts, and that's due to the simple fact that no one can keep up with their technology. Other nations may be able to catch up someday, when their economies are stronger and can afford more defence spending, but right now, the US retains it's #1 spot with ease. The Russian economy is nowhere near capable of supporting a military that is capable of matching the American military, and even the Chinese are decades away from being able to match them. And that's if they choose to, which is doubtful. China, unlike most other imperial powers, has never really had an expansionist leader like Hitler or Napoleon, bent on world domination. Sure, they've had murderous megalomaniacs like Mao, but never someone who actually wanted to conquer the world. Frankly, the current crop of leaders are more worried about the 300 or so million dirt poor migrant workers in China than the US military. I agree that US decline is inevitable, the question, like Ferguson points out, is when and how quickly. Unlike the USSR, the US has plenty of wealthy allies (Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK, etc) with at least adequate militaries of their own (Canada's arguably being one of the best, but also the smallest), to help them with economic crises or conflicts. No, I think US decline will occur gradually, much as the UK's did in the 20th century. However, as is does, I think the world will return to a multi-polar world (like the great power days of the 19th century), rather than a world dominated by one superpower. Given that several European countries are still quite wealthy and militarily powerful, and that newcomers like Brazil and India are industrializing, I think the world will have up to a dozen major nations shaping events. Niall Ferguson is a fantastic historian. You should watch his War of the World documentary (or read it in book form if you prefer). It was a fascinating look at conflict in the 20th century. Some of his other works are equally good reads.
|
cgelsie
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:28 pm
Quote: That's assuming Canada doesn't fracture as well. On the west coast we've always looked south, so Pacifica might become a reality in that case.
Andyt, how are you defining west coast? If you mean the Lower Mainland, maybe. If you mean further up, not necessarily.
|
Posts: 29158
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:34 pm
Mr_Canada wrote: I really don't expect America to collapse, since I've sorta been hearing about it since I was like, 4. "The USA is about to fall apart".
Though, if and when it does, I have some plans in order. So do I. 
|
Posts: 6138
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:03 pm
The problem is, America isn't an empire. It's one very powerful country with a boatload of good alliances and a massive economy. Unlike the Roman Empire, the British Empire, or heck, even the Soviet Union, the United States doesn't keep colonies outside of a few islands that are populated by Americans. Will the US maybe face tougher times due to its massive debt? Fuck yes it will, but will the American "Empire" collapse? No
|
Mr_Canada
CKA Uber
Posts: 11253
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:22 pm
I believe the American empire is informal, - we are the American empire.
But I don't want us to be.
Last edited by Mr_Canada on Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 6422
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:28 pm
America is definitely an empire. It fits the definition to a tee.
|
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 39 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
|