DrCaleb DrCaleb:
andyt andyt:
Oligarchy is not democracy, by definition. Most people think political freedom entails living in a democracy.
Incorrect. Oligarchy means that the elite have the power, not the voters. It's still a democracy, in that voters can still vote, it just voting makes little difference to who wields the power. People still have their freedom to succeed, freedom of speech etc. so Democracy is intact.
Stalin said that 'he who counts the votes' wins the election. But in an Oligarchy 'he who controls the politicians' is really the government.
Actually the researchers don't use the term oligarchy:
$1:
A few people have run with these findings, suggesting that the study proves the US is an oligarchy.
+
“It’s not an unfair characterization,” Gilens said, when we bounced the O-word off him, though he added, “It’s a little bit alarmist.”
+
I guess it depends on how you define oligarchy. If you go with Aristotle’s original definition—”when men of property have the government in their hands”—then, well, yeah. (Although we don’t really stick to Aristotle’s definition of democracy—“when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers”—anymore.) But today oligarchs have become virtually synonymous with the circle of billionaire crony commodities capitalists who make up the Russian power structure. It doesn’t feel like we’re talking about the same thing in this paper. Here’s why:
+
What we cannot do with these data is distinguish definitively among different versions of elite theories. We cannot be sure whether we are capturing the political influence of the wealthiest Americans (the top 1% of wealth-holders? the top 1/10th of 1%?), or, conceivably, the less affluent but more numerous citizens around the 90th income percentile whose preferences are directly gauged by our measure.