[Taseko]

ShepherdsDog wrote:

Quote:

Stephen Harper is a member of the "Christian and Missionary Alliance Church". This is an evangelical church.

Your hero Cracker Jackoff is a member of the United Church....you know one of the two with a big history of diddling native kids.

Quote:

We don't have to kiss ass.

But you seem to have developed a taste for your own ass.

If you are concerned about religious child molesting you might discuss it with your neighborhood RCC first, then with the congregation of your choice. They seem to be having to attend to the fallout of this activity much more than the secular.

But I didn't think you believed that native kids we're diddled by anybody, that they just made it up so we could feel sorry for them....where are you trying to go with this??

If Layton believes the earth is 7000 years old, man existed with dinosaurs, and Noah got everything on a boat then maybe we have to ask him a few questions too. I'm not sure the United Church church believes in the Great Rupture when all the good little boy go to heaven etc. , but Harper likely does....shit!

I'm not anti conservative necessarily, nor pro NDP or Liberal necessarily. It's just that in this instance I believe Harper has to go.

[Taseko]

Unsound wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

It's not a matter of kissing ass, it's a matter of common courtesy and diplomatic convention. Politicians and government officials simply should not interfere in another country's elections.

Then why didn't Bush visit Chrétien, if he was so fucking noble.

But let me assure you, there were a hell of a lot of Canadians supporting the Shrub.

Is there no instance of a US President interfering in Canadian politics or....how about policies?

[ShepherdsDog]

Quote:

It's just that in this instance I believe Harper has to go.

So, you don't believe in the the democratic process is what you're saying? The voter's spoke and because you disn't like the result it's wrong? Well in a few years you'll get your chance to exercise your vote for the first time and then you can try and change the outcome.

Your lack of understandinfg of what religious organizations believe or don't believe is truly tellintg of your stupidity.....you certainly don't let the facts cloud your opinion. You've also demonstrated a lack of comprehension, as you missed the part where i alluded to the UCC being one of the TWO churches with a bad history with kids, of any race.

[Unsound]

Taseko wrote:

Then why didn't Bush visit Chrétien, if he was so fucking noble.

But let me assure you, there were a hell of a lot of Canadians supporting the Shrub.

Is there no instance of a US President interfering in Canadian politics or....how about policies?

Bush didn't visit to show his displeasure in Chretien interfering in his election. That's how diplomacy works.

It doesn't matter how many Canadians supoorted or didn't support Bush. Individuals have all the right in the world to state their opinions on whatever they want. The Prime Minister however, doesn't speak as an individual, he speaks for Canada. And Canada, as a nation, doesn't interfere in our friend's elections.

[Taseko]

Unsound wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

It's not a matter of kissing ass, it's a matter of common courtesy and diplomatic convention. Politicians and government officials simply should not interfere in another country's elections.

Now just before you think I'm trying to suggest we don't have a Sarah Palin, let me admit to having a Stockwell Day. Stockwell is truly one of Canada's great embarrassments and the fact that a lot more than 500 souls voted for him, for Prime Minister, is surely a testament to our silly side. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockwell_Day

So, you have Sarah, we had Stockwell. Harper had him in the coven, in a quiet place for a while and I understand Stockwell left. He now may be curbing used cars, we aren't sure.

[Gunnair]

Taseko wrote:

Unsound wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

It's not a matter of kissing ass, it's a matter of common courtesy and diplomatic convention. Politicians and government officials simply should not interfere in another country's elections.

Now just before you think I'm trying to suggest we don't have a Sarah Palin, let me admit to having a Stockwell Day. Stockwell is truly one of Canada's great embarrassments and the fact that a lot more than 500 souls voted for him, for Prime Minister, is surely a testament to our silly side. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockwell_Day

So, you have Sarah, we had Stockwell. Harper had him in the coven, in a quiet place for a while and I understand Stockwell left. He now may be curbing used cars, we aren't sure.

What a sad state of affairs must have overtaken your squalid little existence; to wander the forums with hands raised in panic above your head, bovine blatherings issuing from you in between your whining mewings and pedestrian observations.

In the end, democracy as this country has known it for many, many decades, was successfully practiced, and for some reason, you've chosen this point in time not to argue for more meaningful ways to improve that practice, nor engage in dialog to reduce the degree of partisanship that often stagnates rational discourse, but instead, to wander the thread with the equivalent of the ham fisted 'Stop Harper' sign and Poli Sci 101 leftard talking points which have no relevance to the conversation and provide demonstrable proof of your gross immaturity.

As has been said before to you.. corner... now.

[DanSC]

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

So is East Timor, but they don't get all butt-hurt when an American President doesn't give them constant attention.

[Taseko]

Gunnair wrote:

What a sad state of affairs must have overtaken your squalid little existence; to wander the forums with hands raised in panic above your head, bovine blatherings issuing from you in between your whining mewings and pedestrian observations.

In the end, democracy as this country has known it for many, many decades, was successfully practiced, and for some reason, you've chosen this point in time not to argue for more meaningful ways to improve that practice, nor engage in dialog to reduce the degree of partisanship that often stagnates rational discourse, but instead, to wander the thread with the equivalent of the ham fisted 'Stop Harper' sign and Poli Sci 101 leftard talking points which have no relevance to the conversation and provide demonstrable proof of your gross immaturity.

As has been said before to you.. corner... now.

I really admired Winston Churchill, a real Conservative. His opinion of tradition, ( and you are really talking about tradition ) was thus:

"Don't talk to me about naval tradition. It's nothing but rum, sodomy, and the lash."

If you can't give me a contest fuck off and let someone else do it...OK.

[ShepherdsDog]

boy...you're a spoon in world full of forks....a sphere in a world of pyramids. You haven't earned a contest because you've demonstrated over and over that you' don't deserve a contest....ridicule yes, a contest no.

[Taseko]

DanSC wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

So is East Timor, but they don't get all butt-hurt when an American President doesn't give them constant attention.

East Timor probably doesn't really give a rats ass. There is a lot of Canada that may feel the same way.

I feel very positive toward the US. You have some truly magnificent people there. I mean it, totally genuine without sarcasm. I think of our Leonard Cohen when he described America: "... the cradle of the best and of the worst."

Let me have see the best of America, you can have Palin and the Tea Baggers. And Harper.....

[Taseko]

ShepherdsDog wrote:

boy...you're a spoon in world full of forks....a sphere in a world of pyramids. You haven't earned a contest because you've demonstrated over and over that you' don't deserve a contest....ridicule yes, a contest no.

Piffle.

[ShepherdsDog]

I could simplify yours even further by keeping the first two letters, changing the double consonant blend and dropping the -le

[Zipperfish]

DanSC wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

So is East Timor, but they don't get all butt-hurt when an American President doesn't give them constant attention.

To tell you the truth it wasn't so much the diplomatic snub so much of the tens of thousands slaughtered in Iraq in a war based on lies, and the whole "let's pick up whoever we feel like and torture them just because we can" policy. That's more what turned me off with Bush.

[DanSC]

Zipperfish wrote:

DanSC wrote:

Taseko wrote:

Canada is another country. Canada is not the US. We can endorse who ever we want. We don't have to kiss ass.

So is East Timor, but they don't get all butt-hurt when an American President doesn't give them constant attention.

To tell you the truth it wasn't so much the diplomatic snub so much of the tens of thousands slaughtered in Iraq in a war based on lies, and the whole "let's pick up whoever we feel like and torture them just because we can" policy. That's more what turned me off with Bush.

Fair enough, but unrelated comment is unrelated.

[Gunnair]

Taseko wrote:

Gunnair wrote:

What a sad state of affairs must have overtaken your squalid little existence; to wander the forums with hands raised in panic above your head, bovine blatherings issuing from you in between your whining mewings and pedestrian observations.

In the end, democracy as this country has known it for many, many decades, was successfully practiced, and for some reason, you've chosen this point in time not to argue for more meaningful ways to improve that practice, nor engage in dialog to reduce the degree of partisanship that often stagnates rational discourse, but instead, to wander the thread with the equivalent of the ham fisted 'Stop Harper' sign and Poli Sci 101 leftard talking points which have no relevance to the conversation and provide demonstrable proof of your gross immaturity.

As has been said before to you.. corner... now.

I really admired Winston Churchill, a real Conservative. His opinion of tradition, ( and you are really talking about tradition ) was thus:

"Don't talk to me about naval tradition. It's nothing but rum, sodomy, and the lash."

If you can't give me a contest fuck off and let someone else do it...OK.

You've been bested, fuckwit... again. Frankly, after our latest round, you're just wallowing around punch drunk dropping another one of your dim diatribes to be ignored by the masses.

You'll get it eventually though.