eureka wrote:
Then, Gunnair, I am not wrong and it is that so incenses you. It is the inability of you and a few others to argue effectively with what I say that riles you. I consider, though I do not look at it, the comments about repping a badge of honour. It is the resort of those who have no backing for their puerile "arguments."
Ah more $20 words to hide your lack of any real argumentative prowess. See, it's hard to effectively argue with someone that constantly says, "I'm right, you're wrong and some guy I say I know says so."
When I mentioned the job loss rate in Spain, you insisted the figure I quoted came from a right wing think tank. When I pointed out that the study you directed me to had a completely different ratio and that the ratio I quoted was direct from the Spanish gov't, you
still insisted it was right wing propaganda.
When I mentioned that Denmark took a hit in their GDP as a result of green energy programs, you pooh-poohed it as more right wing propaganda. Then, in a different thread, you rail on about how if we don't get on top of global warming right away, it'll cost way more than 1-2% of the global GDP to impliment.
So which is it master debator? It can't be right wing propaganda one minute and cold hard fact the next.
So in effect, you are right. It does rile some people when they can't argue effectively with you, but that's only because it's hard to argue with a liar who has their head shoved so far up their ass, everytime they sneeze their zipper whistles.
Forum Elite 
