They won't be getting the money from the USA thanks to President Trump!

Damn straight! Why should the polluter pay into the cleanup?

Scientists need to eat too and money and research grants flow to those who are supporting the most politically attractive trends of the day. Government funding would obviously not go to those who questioned the MMGW theory and sought to explore this from other angles. Scientists aren't necessarily lily white purists either. They have egos and reputations to establish and protect so there can be some bias towards this as well.

Over the years we've learned to be somewhat skeptical about what scientists have to say. Who remembers the "smoking scientists and researchers" of 60 years ago who were in the pay of big tobacco and actually concluded that smoking was highly beneficial. Then there are the foodies and aggies working for the food and agricultural industries who help to sell sugar and chemical additives in diets and a host of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides, all of which are quite harmless.

Then there's the great coffee and wine drinking pissing contests between medical scientists. Sometimes its good, but next time its bad. I like wine and coffee so I'll go down the middle and drink both in modest amounts.

And of course politicians don't know squat about science. They'll run with whatever can be spun into political value and more money. Personally I'll watch my tomato patch for climate trends because I think the tomatoes are a lot smarter and more honest than the UN on climate stuff. Besides, they don't smell and taste like BS.

CO2 is not a pollutant.

I'm not even going there. Nothing more can be said that wasn't the last 9 times that was shown to be wrong.

What pollution?

I thought this was about the globalists telling you they could stop their prophesied Warmageddon by resetting the world's thermostat through control of the gas we exhale. Apparently if they take control of the West's money and are given greater control of behaviour they can do something they've never shown an ability to do before and fix some imagined problem. So they claim, but if they are going to fix a problem (even this imaginary one) it will be the first time we've seen any evidence of this claimed problem fixing capability.

But what pollution?