CNN and the courts have exactly not one right to tell the White House who they can or cannot admit to the grounds. Not even the US Supreme Court has the right to order Jim Acost-her back into the White Hut.

The D.C. circuit court ruled in Sherrill’s favor in 1977. While the court did not demand that the Secret Service issue him a press credential, it did set forth a series of new, transparent steps to ensure that no reporter’s First Amendment rights were violated.
“Once the government creates the kind of forum that it has created, like the White House briefing room, it can’t selectively include or exclude people on the basis of ideology or viewpoint,” said Ben Wizner, the director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.

The new steps enunciated in the Sherrill decision to ensure that reporters’ First Amendment rights are not violated include the requirement to give the reporter notice and the right to rebut a formal written decision, which must accompany any revocation. “We further conclude that notice, opportunity to rebut, and a written decision are required because the denial of a pass potentially infringes upon First Amendment guarantees,” the court’s ruling states. “Such impairment of this interest cannot be permitted to occur in the absence of adequate procedural due process.”

If I was the defense attorney and it came time to present the case of the defense I would stand adjusting my tie, nod to the judge, turn to the jury and utter one word.

"Wah."

Then sit back down with a smug, proggy smirk on my face.

You mean like you do here?

Why? We're you wanting me to use longer sentences? I don't know Fifer. I don't think you're ready for it.

Or are you seeing me with a smug, proggy smirk-face every time I pin your ears back.

To be honest It's me who's not quite ready for that pose yet. Not proggy enough, I guess. I'm working on it though. I have some models.