Your system gives a high score even if overwoke critics gave it a high rating and audiences hate it.

If overwoke critics gave a movie a perfect 100 but audiences only gave it 50, your system would score the movie a perfect score of 200, the same as a a movie where the audience and the critics both gave a perfect score of 100 each.

See this is your problem in general Beave. Reality for you is what you wish would happen rather than what happens.

I already gave you Batwoman as an example to show you that's not true.

I'm telling you as somebody who uses this in the real world it works for me and judging myself to be an average guy, I recommend it.

Ahh...I see what the problem is. Your using your Beaveworld math again rather than the math the rest of use.

Here I'll show you again how it's supposed to work.



When Critic score is higher that audience score you subtract rather than add the two scores.

150 - 50 = 100

Don't pay to see this movie unless your Beave or somebody like him.

If you check out the graphic below you'll note that Rotten Tomatoes has the reviewers rating at 69%. The audience rated it 91%.

So I add 69 to 91 and get 160. Then I deduct 69 from 91 = 22.

Then I add 22 to 160 to get 182. Joker has a 182 rating.

150 is a gotta see it.

If the audience score had been less than the critics I would have deducted Audience from Reviewers and deducted that number from the total of the 2.

Why not just simplify and ignore the critic scores altogether??

Because the more you see different numbers the more you learn to attach a varying personal significance to them.

For example you mentioned Batwoman. Critics were 74% in love with it. Audience had only 23% who didn't hate it.

74 + 23 = 97.
74 - 23 =51.
97 - 51 = 46

For me a 46 reeks of woke or incompetence and you'd have to strap me to a chair with a head brace and my eyes forced open like Alex in A Clockwork Orange to make me watch it.

All this hubub about this movie....and I am never going to see it, lol.

Give Joker a past and he is no longer Batman's greatest villain. I ain't giving that up....

So you'd have trouble seeing a movie about make believe people living in a make believe world because there's a glitch with the comic book character that first appeared almost 80 years ago.

Honestly, yeah. If a character matters to you, and they fundamentally alter it, and potentially ruin an aspect of the character, why would you be okay with it?

Honestly, yeah. If a character matters to you, and they fundamentally alter it, and potentially ruin an aspect of the character, why would you be okay with it?

Doesn’t the 23 tell you that all on its own?