Lol, have a drinking game with Speak the Truth or the enforcer.

His thumbnails are special I grant you that. His analysis has merit and there are a lot of YT and redditiors out there just spamming content with no context. As a subject matter expert he squelches out a lot of the meaningless background noise to focus on the gritty seemingly mundane details (like topographical maps) to focus on the real meat of the issues in this war. Him and Ryan McBeth and Perun have some of the best analysis I have seen.

NATO is putting Russia and any other "Nuclear-armed peer-competitors" on notice that the trans-Atlantic alliance can and will retaliate against any nuclear attack.

The latest document implies that as North Atlantic allies send a stronger signal about threats from Russia's nuclear threats, they also won't fail to keep an eye on China's nuclear arsenal.

That's a more forceful warning than the analogous section of the 2010 document, in which the alliance emphasized that "Circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely remote." The revision also placed more emphasis on France and the United Kingdom's nuclear weapons in an apparent effort to signal that the threat of nuclear retaliation for a Russian nuclear attack wouldn't depend solely on an American president.

His thumbnails are special I grant you that. His analysis has merit and there are a lot of YT and redditiors out there just spamming content with no context. As a subject matter expert he squelches out a lot of the meaningless background noise to focus on the gritty seemingly mundane details (like topographical maps) to focus on the real meat of the issues in this war. Him and Ryan McBeth and Perun have some of the best analysis I have seen.