CKA Forums :: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left

So you post the exact same thing again....

N'duh... i really don't give a shit who coined it, I'm pointing out idiots who use it. Really, really stupid people who use a racist/misogynist post or statement and squawk similar memes like a turkey if someone points it out and act like they're the offended party.

I've decided that there is no real feminism anymore, just a bunch of worthless millenial females stabbing each other in the back at any opportunity they get. They flip out over things like Ghomeshi, who turns out to be just a cretinous little man who didn't do anything that even came close to assault if his alleged victims still tried to maintain contact with him afterwards. Or accusing frat boys of rape, even after some of these offenses turn out to be completely false. The real kick was the throwing under the bus of all the female victims of out of control Muslim males in Cologne on NYE, as well as the steady drumbeat of denial being supported by organized feminism that there is no problem at all in allowing millions of undisciplined savages from a monstrously patriarchal/male-supremacist Islamic culture into secular and moderate Europe. It's just the omelette theory being played with human lives again, in this case where leftist feminism has officially decided that racism and their own white males are so awful that they're openly willing to sacrifice other women, in numbers beyond counting too, to rape and murder at the hands of Muslim males.

It's said that all ideologies eventually eat themselves. Right now it's the turn of the type of post-1960's "white people are all evil" mentality that the left's been playing at for over sixty years to fall apart. The left is now totally reactionary, still biting like a dying rat at it's old enemy even as the worst totalitarianism that's ever existed in Islam is on the rise to wipe out the left, center, and right altogether. The death of an ideology is not pleasant. It's kind of like watching an elderly dementia patient shit it's diapers as it's brain shuts off and it becomes increasingly erratic on a day by day basis until it finally expires.

There was a news story posted on the front page a couple days ago on a girl who had urine poured on her head for disagreeing with Social Justice feminists.

You couldn't comment on the story here, because the title was too long and that somehow seems to block the commenting software.

Let's try it again. This time with 2 libertarians discussing the story (one is the girl who was piss-bombed). They'll introduce you do what a regressive is if you can't figure it out yet. It's interesting, because technically they're from the right being Libertarians (at least she is. I think he is too), yet even they are starting to adopt the term "Regressive." So it's not just Liberals using the term "Regressive Left" anymore.

Ironic, since Ayn Rand actually invented piss-bombing originally. She kept a half dozen in her purse at all times, in case she ran into someone she loathed, which was everybody. She wasn't above leaving a coiler on your doorstep either.

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Glad to have you back!!!! [B-o]

Author:	N_Fiddledog [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
herbie herbie: So you post the exact same thing again.... Even if true a repetition of something would be better than your repetition of nothing. You've got nothin' herb. Stop proving it. Unless, of course, it's some sort living art display of who the Regressive Left are.

Author:	N_Fiddledog [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:10 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left

Author:	herbie [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
N'duh... i really don't give a shit who coined it, I'm pointing out idiots who use it. Really, really stupid people who use a racist/misogynist post or statement and squawk similar memes like a turkey if someone points it out and act like they're the offended party. But how do you or this Nawaz know if the guy you're telling to remove his turban to salute the flag is a Liberal or the Chairperson of your local Conservative Party? And then to claim he's the intolerant one?

Author:	Korked [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
You can look at the feminist debate, movies debate or video game debate but let's look at the Political talk for the moment. If for example Hillary Clinton had Arab political people, maybe even friends who hang out with those who end up attacking the USA...does that make her regressive or progressive or make her kinda stupid to be played, deceived by back stabbing Arabs? If Obama knows people and talks with those from Turk, or Iranian or Saudi areas, he knows some guys or maybe talks with some guy who is supposed to bring peace and make deals but these guys ultimately betray Obama and attack Americans...does that make Obama regressive or progressive or just some silly person who got played by a bunch of radical islamists the left used to call Bush out for the political failures, call out Reagan for his political blunders why not call out other Leftists, why not call out Liberal Democrats when they make mistakes? Here's one news item that's been on fringe news sites and moving to mainstream media Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-0 ... zi-attacks Something that has gone unnoticed in all the talk about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails is the content of the original leak that started the entire investigation to begin with. In March of 2013, a Romanian hacker calling himself Guccifer hacked into the AOL account of Sidney Blumenthal and leaked to Russia Today four e-mails containing intelligence on Libya that Blumenthal sent to Hillary Clinton. For those who haven’t been following this story, Sidney Blumenthal is a long time friend and adviser of the Clinton family who in an unofficial capacity sent many “intelligence memos” to Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State. Originally displayed on RT.com in Comic Sans font on a pink background with the letter “G” clumsily drawn as a watermark, no one took these leaked e-mails particularly seriously when they came out in 2013. Now, however, we can cross reference this leak with the e-mails the State Department released to the public. The first three e-mails in the Russia Today leak from Blumenthal to Clinton all appear word for word in the State Department release. The first e-mail Clinton asks to have printed and she also forwards it to her deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan. The second e-mail Clinton describes as “useful insight” and forwards it to Jake Sullivan asking him to circulate it. The third e-mail is also forwarded to Jake Sullivan. The fourth e-mail is missing from the State Department record completely. This missing e-mail from February 16, 2013 only exists in the original leak and states that French and Libyan intelligence agencies had evidence that the In Amenas and Benghazi attacks were funded by “Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.” This seems like a rather outlandish claim on the surface, and as such was only reported by conspiracy types and fringe media outlets. Now, however, we have proof that the other three e-mails in the leak were real correspondence from Blumenthal to Clinton that she not only read, but thought highly enough of to send around to others in the State Department. Guccifer speaks English as a second language and most of his writing consists of rambling conspiracies, it’s unlikely he would be able to craft such a convincing fake intelligence briefing. This means we have an e-mail from a trusted Clinton adviser that claims the Saudis funded the Benghazi attack ....Did Secretary Clinton not tell anyone what she knew about alleged Saudi involvement in the attacks because she didn’t want to endanger the millions of dollars of Saudi donations coming in to the Clinton Foundation? These are exactly the kind of conflicts that ethical standards are designed to prevent.

Author:	N_Fiddledog [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:13 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
herbie herbie: N'duh... i really don't give a shit who coined it, I'm pointing out idiots who use it. Really, really stupid people who use a racist/misogynist post or statement and squawk similar memes like a turkey if someone points it out and act like they're the offended party. What on earth are you talking about? You seem to want to reference people who claim victimhood then turn around and they're the bullies. It's called the crybully phenomena and it's one of the things the regressive left is famous for. Multiple examples are available. But let's use the one discussed in the video you don't appear to have watched, but seem to be claiming expertise on. In no way does the term "crybully" apply to Lauren Southern in that video. Social Justice warriors had an event shut down in Vancouver. Southern was in town to attend it. Apparently the SJWs were whining in protest of the things they worried the booked guest speaker might say at the event. They were worried people might be triggered. Victims you see. They were claiming victimhood. However the event did not take place. The regressives managed to get the speaker stopped at the border by whining to officials. They were claiming victimhood but they were the bullies. That's how the crybully phenomena works. When Southern got to where the event was supposed to be happening protesters recognized her and objected to her having a stance that conflicted with Marxist feminist groupthink. To them being disagreed with was victimizing them. Southern argued back. She was winning the argument. One of the protesters poured a bottle of something over her head. All her friends who could smell it claimed it was urine. So who was claiming false victimhood? Who was the actual bully? Who was the crybully? The regressive left was. Get it? Now what specifically are you talking about? Do you know?

CKA Forums http://www.canadaka.net/forums/

Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left http://www.canadaka.net/forums/religious-issues-f68/tru-liberal-newatheists-neosecular-vs-the-regressive-left-t115233-60.html	Page 5 of 5

Author:	Korked [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:10 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
Looks like Obama and the Tv show South Park had comment on it Obama also calling out leftie regressives? here's an interesting on from Rebel Media A message to the feminists who attacked Lauren Southern with urine LANGUAGE WARNING: Gavin McInnes reacts to the attack on fellow Rebel correspondent Lauren Southern, who was drenched in urine at a feminist protest, simply for stating that there are only two genders. This is the state of "free speech" in Canada and elsewhere - but this is the year we are fighting back

Author:	Korked [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 10:45 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
Some more on Europe terrorists on the run Watch live scenes from Brussels following 'shoot out' in anti-terror raid Watch our live coverage from the Belgian capital where it's been reported shots have been fired in an anti-terror raid believed to be linked to the Paris terror attacks in November 2015 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -raid.html Belgian police hunt gunman after Brussels anti-terror raid http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/belg ... 21063.html Belgian police launched an anti-terror raid linked to last year's Paris attacks in a Brussels neighborhood and three police officers were slightly injured when shots were fired. and Previous news on European Leftist ideas and failed communities, and forced Multi-Culturalism Molenbeek: The Belgian neighbourhood that’s become a terrorist breeding ground http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/mol ... 6c342fb702 What is it about Molenbeek? The bit of Belgium that was a base for Paris terror attacks http://theconversation.com/what-is-it-a ... acks-51007 Rape, Islam and the Deafening Silence https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2015/1 ... ii-london/ Authorities insist on describing predators only as "Asian". In Banbury, Birmingham, Blackburn, Bristol, Burnley, Cambridge, Carlisle, Derby, Leeds, London, Manchester, Oldham, Oxford, Peterborough, Preston, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sheffield and Telford locals need no translation rotherham rapists A few weeks ago a Muslim sex gang was convicted at the Old Bailey, London’s central criminal court, of raping a girl when she was under sixteen and arranging for another sixty men to do the same. The offences occurred in the quiet market town of Aylesbury. It is just the latest in a long series of trials for rape and sex attacks on under-age English girls by Muslim gangs in town after town right across the country including Banbury, Birmingham, Blackburn, Bristol, Burnley, Cambridge, Carlisle, Derby, Leeds, London, Manchester, Middlesbrough, Oldham, Oxford, Peterborough, Preston, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sheffield and Telford. The victims of these horrible sex crimes were usually vulnerable young girls without families to protect them. Marseilles is now 30-40% Muslim. Excessive violence, riots, and rapes has made it the most dangerous city in Europe https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/20 ... in-europe/ Sweden: 30 grenade attacks in 6 months in Muslim-dominated Malmö http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/swede ... ated-malmo While the Swedish elite celebrates itself by calling the former Viking land a “humanitarian superpower” for letting in hundreds of thousands of Muslims within a handful of years, the country is falling apart. Recently there were four grenade explosions in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city and famous for its high percentage of Muslim citizens, in a single week. The last was the 30th grenade explosion in Malmö since January 2015 (compared to “only” 25 explosions in all of 2014). A bit about Malmö: According to statistics provided by local authorities, 31 percent of the city’s population of 300,000 was born abroad, and nearly 41 percent of the residents have a foreign background. The main countries from which immigration takes place are ones which have been recently plagued by conflicts – migrant groups from Iraq, Syria, the former Yugoslavia and Somalia are among them. The data also says that the Muslim population constitutes about 20 percent of Malmo’s population; this is one of the most significant percentages in Scandinavian cities. Rape is rampant in Sweden. Recently a woman was kidnapped by two asylum seekers who raped her for a week. With around 6,000 reported rapes and many, many more unreported rapes, Sweden is one of the countries in the world with the highest rape rate per citizen.

Author:	Zipperfish [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
Thanos Thanos: I've decided that there is no real feminism anymore, just a bunch of worthless millenial females stabbing each other in the back at any opportunity they get. They flip out over things like Ghomeshi, who turns out to be just a cretinous little man who didn't do anything that even came close to assault if his alleged victims still tried to maintain contact with him afterwards. Or accusing frat boys of rape, even after some of these offenses turn out to be completely false. The real kick was the throwing under the bus of all the female victims of out of control Muslim males in Cologne on NYE, as well as the steady drumbeat of denial being supported by organized feminism that there is no problem at all in allowing millions of undisciplined savages from a monstrously patriarchal/male-supremacist Islamic culture into secular and moderate Europe. It's just the omelette theory being played with human lives again, in this case where leftist feminism has officially decided that racism and their own white males are so awful that they're openly willing to sacrifice other women, in numbers beyond counting too, to rape and murder at the hands of Muslim males. It's said that all ideologies eventually eat themselves. Right now it's the turn of the type of post-1960's "white people are all evil" mentality that the left's been playing at for over sixty years to fall apart. The left is now totally reactionary, still biting like a dying rat at it's old enemy even as the worst totalitarianism that's ever existed in Islam is on the rise to wipe out the left, center, and right altogether. The death of an ideology is not pleasant. It's kind of like watching an elderly dementia patient shit it's diapers as it's brain shuts off and it becomes increasingly erratic on a day by day basis until it finally expires. I missed you.

Author:	Zipperfish [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 4:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: There was a news story posted on the front page a couple days ago on a girl who had urine poured on her head for disagreeing with Social Justice feminists. You couldn't comment on the story here, because the title was too long and that somehow seems to block the commenting software. Let's try it again. This time with 2 libertarians discussing the story (one is the girl who was piss-bombed). They'll introduce you do what a regressive is if you can't figure it out yet. It's interesting, because technically they're from the right being Libertarians (at least she is. I think he is too), yet even they are starting to adopt the term "Regressive." So it's not just Liberals using the term "Regressive Left" anymore. Ironic, since Ayn Rand actually invented piss-bombing originally. She kept a half dozen in her purse at all times, in case she ran into someone she loathed, which was everybody. She wasn't above leaving a coiler on your doorstep either.

Author:	BartSimpson [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 5:06 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
Zipperfish Zipperfish: Ironic, since Ayn Rand actually invented piss-bombing originally. She kept a half dozen in her purse at all times, in case she ran into someone she loathed, which was everybody. She wasn't above leaving a coiler on your doorstep either. Glad to have you back!!!!

Author:	Zipperfish [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Tru Liberal, NewAtheists, NeoSecular VS the Regressive Left
BartSimpson BartSimpson: Zipperfish Zipperfish: Ironic, since Ayn Rand actually invented piss-bombing originally. She kept a half dozen in her purse at all times, in case she ran into someone she loathed, which was everybody. She wasn't above leaving a coiler on your doorstep either. Glad to have you back!!!! Cheers, brother!

Page 5 of 5	All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB ©