[martin14]

hmm.. we'll see if they see 'everything'

[Mustang1]

martin14 martin14:

another question:.. i dont see much communist / nazi

stuff on this site.. why ??


youve been here longer than me

Why would there be Nazi garbage here?

[-Mario-]

What did I miss..??

[martin14]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

martin14 martin14:

another question:.. i dont see much communist / nazi

stuff on this site.. why ??


youve been here longer than me

Why would there be Nazi garbage here?

my broader question is .. ' is there a limit to what can be posted here, or should there be ?? '

[-Mario-]

martin14 martin14:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

martin14 martin14:

another question:.. i dont see much communist / nazi

stuff on this site.. why ??


youve been here longer than me

Why would there be Nazi garbage here?

my broader question is .. ' is there a limit to what can be posted here, or should there be ?? '

THere is a big limit on what can be posted.

http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... ic&t=23273

[Streaker]

-Mario- -Mario-:

What did I miss..??

Very little, IMO, but Martin thought maybe this thread should be locked.

[martin14]

one minute please.. i am reading mario's link

[martin14]

ok, that didnt give me the answer i was looking for..


my question of limit was more oriented towards the quality of the source...

streaker first post was by an author.. who i didnt agree with.

then i googled the author, this Stoctay.. found this second

article which i think 99% of people will agree that it REALLY objectionable..



since i havent seen any communist / nazi traffic, streaker told me that it would get chased off pretty quick..

so what happens if someone posts an article by say ... David Duke


and then how is this author any different ??

[Mustang1]

Well...we allow some pretty ignorant, bigoted, homophobic junk to be posted by CKA members, so why censor junk sources? IF the source and/or subsequent posts violate CKA guidelines, then its gone.

[xerxes]

The difference is that the article Streaker posted is just plain old shitheaded-ness whereas something written by David Duke (which was posted once and only once) is hate speech.

[martin14]

could you comment on the idea that the second article ( the one i posted )

could be interpreted as hate speech towards women...


now that makes you read it.. sorry

[Brenda]

Hmmmm.... I read the first part, and I read his conclusions... I skipped a large part though...

To some extent, I might agree with what he is saying. Don't shoot me, yet! I personally think, there are a couple of women out there, who, if they can't get their way, use the "sexual assault" thing... But definately not most. I agree, that the age of sexual consent might not be the same as the age girls want/are willing to have sex. Some might be younger, some might be older. The statement that "sexual consent should be given the day she can deliver babies" is bull, of course.

So, basicly, this man is a nutjob, who thinks rape doesn't exist if the woman is not torn apart in her genital area, and girls should be able to have sex as of the day they start menstruating, or even earlier.

Hate speech, I dunno. I think this man is quite laughable, and I wouldn't mind a nice discussion with him...

[TheQuietKidd]

Wow... some of those "reasons" that were given for the American involvement in those wars were pretty Red.

After that and reading Brenda's post, I don't even want to give the other story a glance... This man's just no right in the head.

[Benoit]

To me, the only way to qualify the wars of America is to compare them with those of the Great Britain and the Roman Empire because the Pax Romana was the main model of the Pax Britanica which both are now the main models of the Pax Americana.

[martin14]

and noone thinks this author should be put on the "David Duke list"

of people whose writing is not acceptable ?


as i said, i am trying to find out if there is a limit as to what can be brought into this forum.