 The Canadian Patriot Report: Manitoba Man Receives 5 Year Prison Sentence for Defending His HomeLaw & Order | 319 hits | Jun 08 10:47 pm | Posted by: Freakinoldguy Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile-
Warning: MagpieRSS: Failed to parse RSS file. (Mismatched tag at line 1, column 70) in D:\Hosted Sites\canadaka.net\www\includes\rss_fetch\rss_fetch.inc on line 238
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\Hosted Sites\canadaka.net\www\themes\text_ads.php on line 21
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2019 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2019 by Canadaka.net
Dakota, who was CLEARLY in a a self-defence situation, is getting 5 years for essentially doing the same thing Gerald Stanley wasn't convicted of. In fact one could easily argue that Dakota was in a FAR more precarious situation than Stanley.
Similar thing happened to a buddy of mine from Jamaica. Years ago he was convicted of 2nd degree murder for defending himself against 5 White guys. One of them had a knife and slashed my buddy's left arm open from just below the shoulder down to his forearm. The scar is STILL very prominent. He managed to get a hold of the knife in the struggle and gutted the goof that slashed his arm open. That got him 7 years in Kingston. I can't help but think though that if he had been a White guy jumped by 5 Black guys with a knife, if the sentence would have been the same or if he'd even been found guilty at all.
Interesting. Colton Boushie gets killed trespassing and the govt shits its pants whining about the verdict.
Dakota, who was CLEARLY in a a self-defence situation, is getting 5 years for essentially doing the same thing Gerald Stanley wasn't convicted of. In fact one could easily argue that Dakota was in a FAR more precarious situation than Stanley.
Similar thing happened to a buddy of mine from Jamaica. Years ago he was convicted of 2nd degree murder for defending himself against 5 White guys. One of them had a knife and slashed my buddy's left arm open from just below the shoulder down to his forearm. The scar is STILL very prominent. He managed to get a hold of the knife in the struggle and gutted the goof that slashed his arm open. That got him 7 years in Kingston. I can't help but think though that if he had been a White guy jumped by 5 Black guys with a knife, if the sentence would have been the same or if he'd even been found guilty at all.
Speaking of Boushie case comparisons, isn’t it interesting that when its a white guy with a gun not in any imminent danger the verdict is not guilty for self defence ; but when it’s a sleeping unarmed Indian in the act of being murdered and defending himself with the attackers weapon, it’s 2.5 years for manslaughter.
The jury verdict in the case showed that they didn't believe the police and prosecution story that the Stanley's weren't in "imminent" danger from Boushie and his shithead friends. Yours, and Trudeau's, response indicates that there's as much of a "white guy always guilty" attitude in liberal Canada as there is a "Native always guilty" mindset that you accuse everyone else of having.
That sounds like a position he would take. We down south have Donald Trump, but you guys have Justin Trudeau (your version of Chelsea Clinton).
The jury verdict in the case showed that they didn't believe the police and prosecution story that the Stanley's weren't in "imminent" danger from Boushie and his shithead friends. Yours, and Trudeau's, response indicates that there's as much of a "white guy always guilty" attitude in liberal Canada as there is a "Native always guilty" mindset that you accuse everyone else of having.
I’m not saying that the Boushie verdict was wrong but that’s the whole point the bar is so much lower when the accused is a white guy and all the Indians have all he deliberately removed from the jury. All the white guy had to say to the all-white jury is that they were Indians and they were trespassing and being disrespectful and presto he’s a a saint. The HYPOTHETICAL danger the accused may or may not have been in from these youth doesn’t compare to the ACTUAL danger of waking up to being stabbed in the head by a trespassing intruder and yet only the latter gets jail.
Interesting. Colton Boushie gets killed trespassing and the govt shits its pants whining about the verdict.
Dakota, who was CLEARLY in a a self-defence situation, is getting 5 years for essentially doing the same thing Gerald Stanley wasn't convicted of. In fact one could easily argue that Dakota was in a FAR more precarious situation than Stanley.
Similar thing happened to a buddy of mine from Jamaica. Years ago he was convicted of 2nd degree murder for defending himself against 5 White guys. One of them had a knife and slashed my buddy's left arm open from just below the shoulder down to his forearm. The scar is STILL very prominent. He managed to get a hold of the knife in the struggle and gutted the goof that slashed his arm open. That got him 7 years in Kingston. I can't help but think though that if he had been a White guy jumped by 5 Black guys with a knife, if the sentence would have been the same or if he'd even been found guilty at all.
Speaking of Boushie case comparisons, isn’t it interesting that when its a white guy with a gun not in any imminent danger the verdict is not guilty for self defence ; but when it’s a sleeping unarmed Indian in the act of being murdered and defending himself with the attackers weapon, it’s 2.5 years for manslaughter.
UH yeah, that was the point.
The jury verdict in the case showed that they didn't believe the police and prosecution story that the Stanley's weren't in "imminent" danger from Boushie and his shithead friends. Yours, and Trudeau's, response indicates that there's as much of a "white guy always guilty" attitude in liberal Canada as there is a "Native always guilty" mindset that you accuse everyone else of having.
I’m not saying that the Boushie verdict was wrong but that’s the whole point the bar is so much lower when the accused is a white guy and all the Indians have all he deliberately removed from the jury. All the white guy had to say to the all-white jury is that they were Indians and they were trespassing and being disrespectful and presto he’s a a saint. The HYPOTHETICAL danger the accused may or may not have been in from these youth doesn’t compare to the ACTUAL danger of waking up to being stabbed in the head by a trespassing intruder and yet only the latter gets jail.
The Natives in the court that were called for jury duty were recorded as saying things in regards to Stanley that they were "gonna get him". Maybe it's one of the things Trudeau wanted eliminated from jury selection but going in with innocence or guilt predetermined is one of those things that results in a potential juror being disqualified.
- any proof the jury that did come in with the verdict are all racists? or that the judge was too? or is this just the sort of thing a liberal gets to say without being held to account for it the same way that literally every else would?
- does Gerald Stanley's wife getting punched by one of Boushie's buddies during the incident count as "imminent danger" enough for you? or is it a typical thing for the liberal mindset where someone has to be on death's door before they or a family member can defend themselves while being violently attacked?
Just wondering.
comments in the article are mostly from clueless peeps blaming libtards and trudope. these types of laws in canuckistan have been on the books for yrs.
Ignorant laws are no excuse for the ignorant fools who gleefully enforce them.