Yesterday, in the middle of Summer, Greenland Gained a Record-Smashing 4 Gigatons of Snow and IceEnvironmental | 273 hits | Aug 11 6:59 am | Posted by: uwish Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
The ENTIRE global warming climate crisis is a fraud..
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... o-be-fraud
The overwhelming data, from multiple independent sources disagrees with you and no matter how you move the goalposts that isn't going to change.
Like, one day of snowfall won't change the years of melting that Greenland is experiencing.
Look at all the gigatonnes of mass Greenland has lost:
https://www.climato.uliege.be/cms/c_565 ... -greenland
Look at all the mass lost in the ice:
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
4 Gigatonnes of gain isn't even a puddle in the hundreds of gigtonnes lost. You wishing it so doesn't change it.
All I need is one piece of data that falsifies any global warming alarmist and the theory is done.
You are arguing empirical data using opinion. I got tired of the 'Mann is a fraud' argument 20 years ago. If you want to show it's inaccurate, you are going to have to show all the sources proving it are inaccurate.
Then you are going to have to show data showing all the other sources that aren't Mann's graph, that prove Manns graph, are also inaccurate. IIRC, there are 25,000 independent sources that prove Mann was correct.
https://www.independent.co.uk/environme ... 37881.html
Big claims require big proof.
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Fraud all of it. I don't need to spell out all the issues with Man's data. They did that in court, where he LOST.
And that page lists all the sources and groups who have proof of climate change, it isn't about 'consensus'. But you'd know that if you read it.
And you know very well that in Science one proof against a theory does not invalidate that theory. It simply modifies it to fit the rest of the data. And the other 24,999 data sets that prove Mann are still valid.
fraud