Link Related to Canada in some say

Bombardier grounded permanently


Business | 552 hits | Oct 28 7:00 pm | Posted by: Scape

Scandinavian airline SAS is to permanently stop flying Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 planes after several emergencies caused by landing gear problems.

Comments

  1. Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:21 am
    I find it odd the problems are only with one airline. I'm thinking it's not the design of the aircraft causing problem, but shitty maintinence.

  2. by avatar Robair
    Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:28 am
    Pilots generally consider the Dash 8 to be the cats pyjamas. It's supposed to be a great plane to fly.

    They had to design some funky fairings for the wing gear, it has to extend down so far that it needed the extra aerodynamics so the wind resistance doesn't break the gear. Dunno if that would have anything to do with the recent troubles...

  3. by avatar Brenda
    Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:31 am
    It is indeed weird that it is only SAS that has the problems... Maybe they should get a new maintenance crew :?

  4. Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:59 am
    "Robair" said
    Pilots generally consider the Dash 8 to be the cats pyjamas. It's supposed to be a great plane to fly.

    They had to design some funky fairings for the wing gear, it has to extend down so far that it needed the extra aerodynamics so the wind resistance doesn't break the gear. Dunno if that would have anything to do with the recent troubles...


    again, some other airline would be having problems too, plus that sort of thing would have been discovererd in testing or soon afterwards. these planes have been around for a while now. only thing that could really be causing problems based on the fact that it is one airline is poor maintinence and/or poor pilotage, meaning the pilots slam the aircraft onto the runway when landing, or leave the gear extended at too high of a velocity.

    actually, I wonder what the altitudes at some of these airports are. If they are high up, the approach speeds would have to be much higher than at sea level. this could be a problem if the approach speed is above the "Do Not Extend Landing Gear" velocity (Sorry, I don't know the actual term for that). If thats the source of the problem than the company would be justified in getting rid of it's fleet. otherwise, they should actively search for the problem rather than blame the aircraft.

  5. Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:26 am
    Thought about that though; usually a maintinence crew is assigned to one or two different types of aircraft. There is simply to much to learn otherwise. Not saying that coverage of many aircraft can't be done, but it's a possibility that things such as this can occur without specialization.

    However, with specialization it could lead to one guy consistently making the same mistake thinking it is the right thing to do aswell, rather than just lack of experience.

    I'm assuming Denmark's aviation administration will be investigating the accidents, and giving a report on what happened within the next year or so.

  6. Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:53 am
    Maintenance procedures are proscribed by the manufacturer, not the airline. Their is also no industry as anal about doccumentation and accountability as aircraft makers. One of the side effects of lawyers.
    I doubt SAS is doing anything wrong and my bet is they are on the bleeding edge of a now discovered problem.
    That said.. Bombardier better start paying back the people of Canada and the government, in that order, while they still have money.

  7. Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:05 pm
    Using OPP as a standard---I predict that SAAB is just putting a competing madel into production.

  8. Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:08 pm
    "ridenrain" said
    Maintenance procedures are by the manufacturer


    8O 8O :lol:


    Sorry, couldn't resist...

  9. Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:12 pm
    "Brenda" said
    It is indeed weird that it is only SAS that has the problems... Maybe they should get a new maintenance crew :?


    Makes me wonder where OPP works. :?:

  10. Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:16 am
    "Streaker" said
    Maintenance procedures are by the manufacturer


    8O 8O :lol:


    Sorry, couldn't resist...

    tr.v. pro·scribed, pro·scrib·ing, pro·scribes
    1. To denounce or condemn.
    2. To prohibit; forbid. See Synonyms at forbid.
    3.
    a. To banish or outlaw (a person).
    b. To publish the name of (a person) as outlawed.


    No. That dosen't work, does it. :oops:

  11. Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:06 am
    word you are thinking of is "prescribed"

  12. by avatar Brenda
    Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:12 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    It is indeed weird that it is only SAS that has the problems... Maybe they should get a new maintenance crew :?


    Makes me wonder where OPP works. :?:

    Ohhh, you're mean!

    (does he work at all? :twisted:)


    ;-)

  13. Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:21 am
    Brenda wrote
    BartSimpson wrote:
    Brenda wrote:
    It is indeed weird that it is only SAS that has the problems... Maybe they should get a new maintenance crew


    Makes me wonder where OPP works.

    Ohhh, you're mean!

    (does he work at all? )

    Really! Good point.

  14. Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:12 am
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    word you are thinking of is "prescribed"

    Illiterate might work too.



view comments in forum
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook



News Link:


Advertise