Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
"Streaker" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
"RUEZ" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Have some respect for once.
way too difficult for that little freak...
its a shame their soldiers dont get a little more respect over there..
"Streaker" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
"Streaker" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
By far one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard.
"Streaker" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
"Streaker" said What about the innocent civilians killed in these wars?
Your attention to the plight of the innocent few who are killed is overshadowed by your complete disrespect for the soldiers sent to help the country as a whole.
Instead of hiding in the forums and whining, get and do something... or shut up.
"Gunnair" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
Idiot.
Thousands more choose to not participate in this kind of stuff.
"Gunnair" said What about the innocent civilians killed in these wars?
Your attention to the plight of the innocent few who are killed is overshadowed by your complete disrespect for the soldiers sent to help the country as a whole.
Instead of hiding in the forums and whining, get and do something... or shut up.
"The innocent few", eh?
Civilians always get it far worse than soldiers in war. Your attempt to gloss over this is regrettable.
"Streaker" said Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
Idiot.
Thousands more choose to not participate in this kind of stuff.
Two words too many Streaker..
Thousands choose to parcipitate in this kind of stuff.
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
way too difficult for that little freak...
its a shame their soldiers dont get a little more respect over there..
they did give their lives, after all..
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Thats low, even for you.
can we get a salut emoticon in our inventory?
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
By far one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard.
The Harper government does not let us know who they are. What a shame!
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
Idiot.
What about the innocent civilians killed in these wars?
Your attention to the plight of the innocent few who are killed is overshadowed by your complete disrespect for the soldiers sent to help the country as a whole.
Instead of hiding in the forums and whining, get and do something... or shut up.
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
Idiot.
Thousands more choose to not participate in this kind of stuff.
What about the innocent civilians killed in these wars?
Your attention to the plight of the innocent few who are killed is overshadowed by your complete disrespect for the soldiers sent to help the country as a whole.
Instead of hiding in the forums and whining, get and do something... or shut up.
"The innocent few", eh?
Civilians always get it far worse than soldiers in war. Your attempt to gloss over this is regrettable.
Actually, the Brits have it right if they eschew the sort of cheap, corny "support our troops" sentimentalism which would keep them from thinking critically about the consequences of war.
Nice. Thousands have it wrong but one forum hero has all the answers.
Idiot.
Thousands more choose to not participate in this kind of stuff.
Two words too many Streaker..
Thousands choose to parcipitate in this kind of stuff.