Good Morning Guest
|
login
or
register
Home
Canadian News
Popular News
News Voting Log
News Images
Forums
Recent Topics Scroll
Politics Forums
Sports Forums
Regional Forums
Content
Achievements
Canadian Content
Famous Canadians
Famous Quotes
Jokes
Canadian Maps
Photos
Picture Gallery
Wallpapers
Recent Activity
About
About
Contact
Link to Us
Points
Statistics
Shop
Register
Gold Membership
Archive
Canadian TV
Canadian Webcams
Groups
Links
Top 10's
Reviews
CKA Radio
Video
Weather
Iraqi city has higher cancer rates than Hiroshi
20698
Iraqi city has higher cancer rates than Hiroshima
Health
|
206975 hits
| Jul 25 11:39 am | Posted by:
Scape
6
The survey found that in the five years following the 2004 attacks by USA-led forces there has been a four-fold increase in all cancer.
Comments
by
Guy_Fawkes
Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:28 pm
Wow its interesting seeing people jumping to conclutions. The article is less than 300 words and people are foaming at the mouth about how evil the US is.
by
Brenda
Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:19 pm
Or is the testing better than before?
by
KorbenDeck
Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:29 pm
Guess lots of depleted uranium rounds were used during the taking of that city
by
Dragom
Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:20 pm
Yes they should really put warning labels on bombs, "Caution: may cause adverse health effects" or something.
by
Brenda
Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:24 pm
"Dragom" said
Yes they should really put warning labels on bombs, "Caution: may cause adverse health effects" or something.
by
Guy_Fawkes
Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:15 am
"KorbenDeck" said
Guess lots of depleted uranium rounds were used during the taking of that city
That would depend, what was the radiation level of the city before the war?
view comments in forum
Page 1
You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.
Login
Register
(free)
Share
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2024 by Canadaka.net
Yes they should really put warning labels on bombs, "Caution: may cause adverse health effects" or something.
Guess lots of depleted uranium rounds were used during the taking of that city
That would depend, what was the radiation level of the city before the war?