Motorcycleboy Motorcycleboy:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Thanks for reminding me to call my father. I just did and asked him that very question. He said no. He said that more then 1/3 were Liberal but a true reflection that it was largely uniform across the political board with only a minority of soldiers actually taking a substantial interest in politics. He also said that many were simply against whatever party was in power when cuts were being made and remembers more then a few virulently anti-PC as well as those who were anti-Liberal. There might currently be more outspoken anti-liberals simply because they are in power again but all and all we do not have a "conservative" military.
Not likely. You can say what you want about Mulroney, but the PC's were good to the forces. Under Mulroney, we saw an increase in numbers after years of Trudeau's cuts, we saw new rifles, the re-introduction of separate uniforms, new helicopters (later cancelled by the Libs), etc.
I remember the 93 election and there weren't many guys voting Liberal. There still aren't.
He said otherwise. He had more years in the service then you have been alive. I trust him and I don't trust you. 'nuff said.
$1:
Derby
I'm sorry but MCB is right on this point. I am currently working with about 2500 soldiers and 1/3 of Canada's Combat soldiers and everytime I here anything resembling a grumble on politics I tend to dig a little further. As far as I can tell you most (as in 9/10) are saying a great deal of bad things about the Liberal Gov't because they in the last 50 years have had the worst track record on cutting the military.
I'm sure loads are grumbling. He said that the grumbling always went against the party in charge. The food and the gov't were always the targets. As for who has cut the military the most, the PC gov't was just as bad and they managed to put us so far in debt that the only way we can truly repair and re-equip the military would be to put us much farther in debt. They did us no favours.
$1:
Liberal Gov'ts in the last 50 years have followed the same model. Promiss more money to the Military and then as the belt tightens the first one to take a cut is the military. There is a great deal of equiptment that very few people know has been bought and canceled. Or the number of upgrades to the existing equiptment that have been "Reschedualed" and when the time comes they push it back again. It is a track record that they have set in the last 50 years that the soldiers, airmen and sailors disagree with.
Of course you already know that the last 50 years was not all under Liberal gov't and although I absolutely agree our military is always first up on the cut list it has been just as bad under cons the as Libs.