[Mustang1]

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

mtbr mtbr:

Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:

ridenrain ridenrain:

The question is, why wouldn't this happen to pot as it does to cigarettes or alcohol.

So how is showing that pot, alcohol, and cigarettes are all the same help your case that just one of the three should be illegal?

we have a problem with two substances so we should throw in a third?..we don't need any more legal drugs.

Maybe you don't. Maybe others feel differently. Who are you to telll them how to live thier lives, comrade?

go light your bong..

Go ride yer bike...

Legalization or decriminalization is coming whether the Puritans want it or not. These antiquated dinosaurs sound like a modern day prohibitionist and we all know what happened there. But, hey, can you imagine if someone treaded on their rights?

eat shit

Brilliant retort dummy...but keep your recreations to yourself pervo.

Off topic as usual - our resident dropout recluse just wrecked the thread.

ahhh we better delete the whole thing now

Nah, just your dipsh*t junk. Still off topic, suck.

[mtbr]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Benoit Benoit:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

mtbr mtbr:

Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:

ridenrain ridenrain:

The question is, why wouldn't this happen to pot as it does to cigarettes or alcohol.

So how is showing that pot, alcohol, and cigarettes are all the same help your case that just one of the three should be illegal?

we have a problem with two substances so we should throw in a third?..we don't need any more legal drugs.

Maybe you don't. Maybe others feel differently. Who are you to telll them how to live thier lives, comrade?

The behaviors of drug addicts in the public space is everybody's business.

No it isn't.

When they check into a publicly funded rehab clinic it is.

Like all those alcoholics and nicotine addicts? Thinking about banning those too, Puritan?

yup I'm all for it..I bet you think I'm sitting here drinking a beer

I don't care what you do, Puritan, but evidently you deem it fit to legislate others.

my tax dollars....my opinion

Opinions are like assholes, dropout. Try making an argument, dullard.

not going to get the last word in

[DerbyX]

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

[Mustang1]

I'll reiterate my original comment (in the hopes that uneducated dropout shut-ins stay on the sidelines where they belong) and ask how decriminalization of marijuana is any worse socially than alcohol and nicotine. We tried Prohibition and for those that have any perspective, we know how that turned out

[Mustang1]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

[mtbr]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

I see the king of flame has returned.

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

I see the king of flame has returned.

far better then the king of bolloxs.

[Mustang1]

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

I see the king of flame has returned.

Sorry, Queen of Dumb, but i've been on topic more than you and your comment to Zip preceded any posting here. As per usual you're wrong, dummy

Oh...and the irony of your post isn't lost on anyone that's graduated high school, dropout

[Mustang1]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

I see the king of flame has returned.

far better then the king of bolloxs.

Or the Prince of Perv (he's into eating poop...he's already projected onto others)

[DerbyX]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Its pretty pointless debating him isn't it Mustang1?

Its amazing how much the cons talk about freedom from gov't (which really means they don't like paying taxes), extoll the military in "fighting for it" yet if its something they don't personally believe in then they have no problem whatsoever dening that freedom.

He's not debating, he merely thinks that posting anything, it's something. He doesn't get it so this is all the poor dumb animal can muster. Oh well...it's fun kicking his ignorance around

I see the king of flame has returned.

Sorry, Queen of Dumb, but i've been on topic more than you and your comment to Zip preceded any posting here. As per usual you're wrong, dummy

Oh...and the irony of your post isn't lost on anyone that's graduated high school, dropout

Well not everybody. I assume Ryan graduated highschool to get into (Sheridan was it) college.

He did get an A+ in poli-sci from a "liberal" prof afterall.

[Wally_Sconce]

There's a difference between DerbyX sitting on his comfy couch smoking a joint,

and, a hardened drug dealer that shoots his competitors, and rapes his women all in the name of drugs and profit.....The drug dealer does his own dirty work.

DerbyX, just because your joint comes out of a cellophane bag, doesn't mean that you are on higher moral ground.

[ridenrain]

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Benoit Benoit:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

mtbr mtbr:

Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:

ridenrain ridenrain:

The question is, why wouldn't this happen to pot as it does to cigarettes or alcohol.

So how is showing that pot, alcohol, and cigarettes are all the same help your case that just one of the three should be illegal?

we have a problem with two substances so we should throw in a third?..we don't need any more legal drugs.

Maybe you don't. Maybe others feel differently. Who are you to telll them how to live thier lives, comrade?

The behaviors of drug addicts in the public space is everybody's business.

No it isn't.

When they check into a publicly funded rehab clinic it is.

Like all those alcoholics and nicotine addicts? Thinking about banning those too, Puritan?

yup I'm all for it..I bet you think I'm sitting here drinking a beer

I don't care what you do, Puritan, but evidently you deem it fit to legislate others.

my tax dollars....my opinion

Opinions are like assholes, dropout. Try making an argument, dullard.

not going to get the last word in

That's funny.
By master debator rules, the last person who comments wins and it looks like Mtbr got that one. Demo-Derby even feels so sorry that he has to root for his favorite side.

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

[DerbyX]

ridenrain ridenrain:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Benoit Benoit:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

mtbr mtbr:

Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:

ridenrain ridenrain:

The question is, why wouldn't this happen to pot as it does to cigarettes or alcohol.

So how is showing that pot, alcohol, and cigarettes are all the same help your case that just one of the three should be illegal?

we have a problem with two substances so we should throw in a third?..we don't need any more legal drugs.

Maybe you don't. Maybe others feel differently. Who are you to telll them how to live thier lives, comrade?

The behaviors of drug addicts in the public space is everybody's business.

No it isn't.

When they check into a publicly funded rehab clinic it is.

Like all those alcoholics and nicotine addicts? Thinking about banning those too, Puritan?

yup I'm all for it..I bet you think I'm sitting here drinking a beer

I don't care what you do, Puritan, but evidently you deem it fit to legislate others.

my tax dollars....my opinion

Opinions are like assholes, dropout. Try making an argument, dullard.

not going to get the last word in

That's funny.
By master debator rules, the last person who comments wins and it looks like Mtbr got that one. Demo-Derby even feels so sorry that he has to root for his favorite side.

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Awwww. ridenhack or should I say ridencheerleader has to slink to the aid of one of his slopmates.

Then you bitch about others "getting the last word" when all you seem to do is cry about others getting the last word as a spineless attempt to get it yourself.

Pathetic.

[Wally_Sconce]

even the people that used to smoke it think its for f#cking losers.

[ridenrain]

DerbyX DerbyX:

ridenrain ridenrain:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Mustang1 Mustang1:

mtbr mtbr:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Benoit Benoit:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

mtbr mtbr:

Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:

ridenrain ridenrain:

The question is, why wouldn't this happen to pot as it does to cigarettes or alcohol.

So how is showing that pot, alcohol, and cigarettes are all the same help your case that just one of the three should be illegal?

we have a problem with two substances so we should throw in a third?..we don't need any more legal drugs.

Maybe you don't. Maybe others feel differently. Who are you to telll them how to live thier lives, comrade?

The behaviors of drug addicts in the public space is everybody's business.

No it isn't.

When they check into a publicly funded rehab clinic it is.

Like all those alcoholics and nicotine addicts? Thinking about banning those too, Puritan?

yup I'm all for it..I bet you think I'm sitting here drinking a beer

I don't care what you do, Puritan, but evidently you deem it fit to legislate others.

my tax dollars....my opinion

Opinions are like assholes, dropout. Try making an argument, dullard.

not going to get the last word in

That's funny.
By master debator rules, the last person who comments wins and it looks like Mtbr got that one. Demo-Derby even feels so sorry that he has to root for his favorite side.

Net result is there are no examples of pot being taxed effectively anywhere else, and because pot grown in Canada is destined for the states, it won't make any difference anyways.

Awwww. ridenhack or should I say ridencheerleader has to slink to the aid of one of his slopmates.

Then you bitch about others "getting the last word" when all you seem to do is cry about others getting the last word as a spineless attempt to get it yourself.

Pathetic.

Is there anyplace in the world that taxes pot?

$1:

B. The Netherlands

Proponents of legalization almost certainly would cite Amsterdam as the drug Mecca of the Western world. Anyone may go into the restaurants in this city and order marijuana and hashish from a menu; further, heroin and cocaine have been decriminalized for all practical purposes. The police simply leave the users alone. Consequently, health officials estimate that Amsterdam has 7,000 addicts, 20% of whom are foreigners.58 These addicts are responsible for 80% of all property crime in the city, thus necessitating that Amsterdam maintain a police presence far greater than those of cities of comparable size in the United States.59

The Dutch have not raised one dollar in tax revenue from drug sales, and drug violators account for 50 percent of the Dutch prison population, a higher proportion than in the United States.60 The Netherlands is the most crime-prone nation in Europe and most drug addicts live on state welfare payments and by committing crimes.61 Nationwide, the number of reported crimes increased to 1.3 million in 1992 from. 812,000 in 1981.62 Faced with public disgust at home over soaring drug related crime and pressure from other European Community countries to strengthen drug laws, Dutch authorities are implementing an aggressive program to reduce drug-linked crimes and disturbances and show new teeth in combatting illegal drug sales.63 Eberhard van der Laan, leader Of the Social Democrats in the Amsterdam City Council says, "People are absolutely fed up with all the troubles caused by drug addicts - car windows broken, noise, whole streets almost given up to the drug problem."64 Legalization advocates claim that marijuana use in Netherlands has not increased since the laws were liberalized, but the number of Amsterdam drug cafes rose from 30 to over 300 in one decade. They also fail to note that daily marijuana use by U.S. youth has declined by 75 percent.65

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/DEB ... myths4.htm