|
Author |
Topic Options
|
oldboy
Junior Member
Posts: 23
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:55 pm
Now there was an awesome game, Zen!

|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:56 pm
American Patriot said, $1: Let China do that we will all die together.....Do you think China wants to save itself or does it want to help the commonwealth no!
I didn't let China do anything. It was you guys who borrowed all that money from them. I think China does want to save itself though and if the US were to declare war on most of the world, then saving itself would cause China to cut their monetary losses. I never said they'd back the Commonwealth or the EU, just that they'd peg their money (presently pegged to the USD) to the Euro and start calling in debt.
War is about about a hell of a lot more than who has the fanciest guns.
|
Posts: 658
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:28 am
Zenfisher Zenfisher: Risk Anyone? 
mmmmmmmmm risk.
|
Posts: 19817
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:51 am
1Peg 1Peg: Zenfisher Zenfisher: Risk Anyone?  mmmmmmmmm risk.
You need the whole north america for those five armies...
|
Zenfisher
Active Member
Posts: 356
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:23 pm
-Mario- -Mario-: 1Peg 1Peg: Zenfisher Zenfisher: Risk Anyone?  mmmmmmmmm risk. You need the whole north america for those five armies...
Finally...someone got the point. 
|
Posts: 19817
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:07 am
Its just a game zen... just a game...
|
jerrysb
Junior Member
Posts: 91
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:45 pm
chances are, ife their would ever be a war, we would be the first to fall. Then underground militias, similar to the french resistance would form. and when are we talking about. As iraq as showed, it's a lot easier to invade a country than it is to hold it in check. and With china gaining more and more political and economic power everry day, who knows.
i think a bettr question isn't who loses, but who wins.
|
jerrysb
Junior Member
Posts: 91
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:46 pm
chances are, ife their would ever be a war, we would be the first to fall. Then underground militias, similar to the french resistance would form. and when are we talking about. As iraq as showed, it's a lot easier to invade a country than it is to hold it in check. and With china gaining more and more political and economic power everry day, who knows.
i think a bettr question isn't who loses, but who wins.
|
jerrysb
Junior Member
Posts: 91
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:46 pm
chances are, ife their would ever be a war, we would be the first to fall. Then underground militias, similar to the french resistance would form. and when are we talking about. As iraq as showed, it's a lot easier to invade a country than it is to hold it in check. and With china gaining more and more political and economic power everry day, who knows.
i think a bettr question isn't who loses, but who wins.
|
jerrysb
Junior Member
Posts: 91
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:46 pm
chances are, ife their would ever be a war, we would be the first to fall. Then underground militias, similar to the french resistance would form. and when are we talking about. As iraq as showed, it's a lot easier to invade a country than it is to hold it in check. and With china gaining more and more political and economic power everry day, who knows.
i think a bettr question isn't who loses, but who wins.
|
AdamNF
Forum Elite
Posts: 1134
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:20 pm
Americans military is to small to defend against the commonwealth.
How many people live in the USA..300mil Make that 2-3 billion in the commonwealth. Plus the USA depends on its airforce. Indias airforce beat the USA this year in countless airwar games. The USA might have a large military, but its not the largest in the world. Yes they have the best gear and technology, but technology doesnt win a war.
|
polemarch1
Forum Addict
Posts: 940
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:49 pm
Except both India and Pakistan have bigger worries then Canada. Most Commonwealth countries would have a hard time transporting troops as well (with the exception of Britain).
One thing that hasn't come up is the American strategy where they to invade. What if they where to use a divide and conqour strategy? ie. tell the seperatists in Quebec and Alberta that they will become independant countries.
|
polemarch1
Forum Addict
Posts: 940
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:51 pm
Except both India and Pakistan have bigger worries then Canada. Most Commonwealth countries would have a hard time transporting troops as well (with the exception of Britain).
One thing that hasn't come up is the American strategy where they to invade. What if they where to use a divide and conqour strategy? ie. tell the seperatists in Quebec and Alberta that they will become independant countries.
Good to see yeah back Adam
|
polemarch1
Forum Addict
Posts: 940
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 6:02 pm
Except both India and Pakistan have bigger worries then Canada. Most Commonwealth countries would have a hard time transporting troops as well (with the exception of Britain).
One thing that hasn't come up is the American strategy where they to invade. What if they where to use a divide and conqour strategy? ie. tell the seperatists in Quebec and Alberta that they will become independant countries.
Good to see yeah back Adam
|
|
Page 2 of 3
|
[ 35 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
|