Pretty interesting article. First, let's recognize that it is Rafe Mair's opinion. Also, his ``point of view`` is based after the fact (not criticizing, only stating that it's easier to voice their opinion after the fact). Would he have reacted differently if he had been a negotiator (at the table) in those particular times?
I am not criticizing the article itself for it has some good points. Also, remember that there were both side of the political parties involved, Trudeau at one point, then again, Mulroney tried his approach.
$1:
(Some would say that if Charlottetown had passed, the separatist movement would have been dead for all time. This is nonsense. The new deal for Quebec proposed by Charlottetown ....)
Does anyone know how to fix this issue? I would like to hear it.
For as you know from my previous posts, I can certainly attest to the fact that I would like to get this matter solved once and for all. Plus, consider the amount of money being spent on every referendum. I would like to see an end to that.