Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
bootlegga bootlegga:
Well of course the cost has gone up - the first of these ships were supposed to in the water BEFORE the Protecteur was decommissioned (around 2012), but the government cancelled the planned order of three in 2008, then took years to restart the process and only ordered two of them in 2014/15.
Yet another screw-up on the defence file that lands at the feet of the previous government.
Actually the "screwup" hasn't landed at the feet of the current Liberal gov't so much as it's coming home to roost. Both gov't have been extremely lax and uncaring when it comes to the acquisition of military hardware and the cost overruns show this haphazard method of decision making.
I agree that both governments have bollixed up defence procurement, but this happened on the Conservatives watch - the Liberals started looking for replacement AORS in 1999 and had a plan to replace them before the existing AORs were decommissioned.
As your article notes, the Conservative government cancelled the project in 2008 and delayed the entire thing. Had they followed the Liberal's procurement plan, we would have had these in the water before we had to retire both AORs.
And let's be honest, Harper inherited a $14 billion surplus in 2008, but chose to use that for a tax cut instead of funding the Navy properly.
Harper loved to wrap himself in the flag and pretend he spent big on the armed forces, but under his government, defence spending fell even farther than it did under Chretien - Chretien averaged 1.23% per year, while Harper averaed only 1.17% per year, with two years (fiscal 2103 and 2014) at a 1.0% per capita spending. Those two years are the LOWEST years for defence spending since before World War 2. Even beatnik JT has averaged 1.275% per year since he got into office.
But somehow it's only the Liberals who don't fund the armed forces.
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
Given the cost overruns to date and the increases which are likely to continue maybe we shouldn't be building these joint support ships at all and should be leasing ships converted like the MV Asterix. They could then be crewed with mixed crews which would be a great help given the recruiting issues the military is having.
I disagree - if we're going to maintain blue water capability, then we should build the right vessels and crew them with RCN sailors, not convert civilian freighters into half-baked abortions and use mixed crews.
What we should have done was build them in South Korea like New Zealand did with their AOR:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/121951 ... ives-in-nzTheir new ship is roughly the same size and weight, but carries a slightly different load-out than the AORs we're building, and are much cheaper and would have allowed us to build 4 or 5 for the same price (instead of 2).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMNZS_Aotearoa