CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30103
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 7:50 am
 


Title: Alberta ministers booed as they discuss climate-change plan with rural leaders
Category: Provincial Politics
Posted By: Alta_redneck
Date: 2016-11-17 18:36:07
Canadian


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4914
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 7:50 am
 


"Hoffman said it�s necessary to address climate change because the science behind it is real and there are serious health concerns tied to burning coal."

There is no real science behind climate anything, when do we get to send these ass clowns packing? 2.8 years?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:21 am
 


o


Last edited by Lemmy on Tue May 02, 2017 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:07 am
 


uwish uwish:
"Hoffman said it�s necessary to address climate change because the science behind it is real..."


No, the 'science' is based upon polling the consensus opinions of scientists who all agree with global warming alarmism without ever testing the science behind it. The polling data that says that global warming is real also says that the UK stayed in the EU and that Hillary Clinton is the next President of the USA.


uwish uwish:
"...and there are serious health concerns tied to burning coal."


This much is true and I do not have any qualms with reasonable measures to improve air quality while still making energy affordable to as many people as practicable.

uwish uwish:
There is no real science behind climate anything, when do we get to send these ass clowns packing? 2.8 years?


It isn't about science, it's about political agendas.

I say that because the same 'solutions' to global warming are also the same solutions that the left trots out for every human condition:

* End Western Civilization
* End industrial enterprise in the Western countries (it's okay everywhere else)
* End individual freedom
* Eugenics
* Euthanasia
* Global socialist government

These are their solutions to EVERYTHING and it has NOTHING to do with science.

Nothing at all.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12398
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:34 am
 


Climate science applied to weather forecasting.....


Attachments:
CS.jpg
CS.jpg [ 42.53 KiB | Viewed 618 times ]
Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:42 am
 


:lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:33 am
 


Climate Science of the deniers who don't understand the difference between weather and climate: Image
"I don't see no global warming."


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26119
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:50 am
 


Lemmy Lemmy:
uwish uwish:
There is no real science behind climate anything

Real scientists (people who are actual physicists, chemists and the like) disagree with you. So who should lay folks like me listen to? You or all of them?


I find it fascinating that somebody who claims to have a personal relationship with professor of economics and world renowned skeptic Ross McKitrick doesn't know a basic fact like there are all kinds of scientists of any description you can think of in the skeptic community. He's connected to them.

As to the whole "climate consensus" idea - that's deceptive. First of all the claim "97% of scientists agree" is a false claim. The Cook paper was disclaimed by multiple actual scientists, and even if it wasn't, it doesn't say what you would like to imply it does.

Basically the story goes like this. If the claim is "Climate changes" - of course it does and you get a better consensus than 97% on that one.

If the claim is humans have a significant impact the consensus lessens, but you still have a majority agreement although it can pare off even more depending on what you mean by "significant."

However, once you start talking about a fast approaching climate apocalypse caused by fossil fuel use any claim of majority agreement is over. At that point the claim of scientific consensus in particular is bogus nonsense. Show me the peer-reviewed paper that supports such a scientific consensus. You can't. It doesn't exist.

There does however seem to be consensus amongst the regressive left that globalist controls are necessary to prevent their imagined Warmageddon.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26119
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:29 pm
 


andyt andyt:
Climate Science of the deniers who don't understand the difference between weather and climate: Image
"I don't see no global warming."


My God, you're dim. Go back and pay attention to what he actually said.

He showed a joke graphic and told you that was what weather forecasting would look like if they operated the way climate forecasters do.

How does your moronic comment make the joke irrelevant?

Weather forecasting is required to show a result that's noticeably more or less accurate more than not. Climate forecasts are nothing more than uncheckable guesses so broad they're irrelevant. That's the point. The point is how they differ, not that they don't.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.