[BartSimpson]

Thanos Thanos:

Maybe if the endless train wreck of the great tweeting orange dickbag's clown show antics wasn't a constant ratings-grabbing distraction the media would pay more attention to what's going on. Then again if the new regime's policy is telling everyone else on the planet to fuck off and hyuck-hyuck-'Murika First! why should the media or viewers take overseas news seriously at all when the cretin at the top of the food chain isn't?

You're not seeing what's happening here, are you? Obama never said diddly shit about the Iranian mullahs fucking over and oppressing their own people. Quite to the contrary he gave them $150 billion towards their nuclear program.

The reason these people feel empowered to risk their lives to stand up against the regime in Tehran is precisely because there's right now an American President who not only isn't "siding with the Muslims" (meaning the crazies) he's standing up to the fuckers and that emboldens the secular, progressive, freedom-loving types of people I thought you supported.

[Sunnyways]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Thanos Thanos:

Maybe if the endless train wreck of the great tweeting orange dickbag's clown show antics wasn't a constant ratings-grabbing distraction the media would pay more attention to what's going on. Then again if the new regime's policy is telling everyone else on the planet to fuck off and hyuck-hyuck-'Murika First! why should the media or viewers take overseas news seriously at all when the cretin at the top of the food chain isn't?

You're not seeing what's happening here, are you? Obama never said diddly shit about the Iranian mullahs fucking over and oppressing their own people. Quite to the contrary he gave them $150 billion towards their nuclear program.

The reason these people feel empowered to risk their lives to stand up against the regime in Tehran is precisely because there's right now an American President who not only isn't "siding with the Muslims" (meaning the crazies) he's standing up to the fuckers and that emboldens the secular, progressive, freedom-loving types of people I thought you supported.

Not everything is about America. I can't imagine the protesters would want to be associated with Trump who banned them from travelling to the US and wants to make life harder for all Iranians.

[BartSimpson]

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

Not everything is about America. I can't imagine the protesters would want to be associated with Trump who banned them from travelling to the US and wants to make life harder for all Iranians.

Not something I talk about a lot but I've been to Iran and the people there not only love America and Americans they particularly love the kind of Americans who don't kiss the asses of the mullahs. In my day that meant they revered Reagan and they liked Bill Clinton.

I can only imagine that they like Trump because regardless of what you think of Trump the man is bringing the Iranian people closer to freedom.

[Zipperfish]

No the people of Iran do not love America. I know plenty of them. If anything they somewhat sympathize with having rulers that embarrass them.

But Iranians remember the 1953 coup, the support for Saddam, and the shooting down of a civilian aircraft by US forces. They want freedom but know that the US is not their friend.

[ShepherdsDog]

Until Trump is gone, the US leadership really isn't a friend to anyone.

[Zipperfish]

I don't think it makes much difference, to be honest. Iran is pretty securely in the Sino-Russian sphere, and changing US leadership won't likely change that. Trump is a symptom, not a cause. He's a symptom if an empire that sees its reach threatened, and is responding by trying to rekindle its youth of nationalism and religion. In my opinion anyway.

[ShepherdsDog]

It's in the Elagabalus phase of Empire right now with elements of Caligula and Diocletian thrown in just to make it even more twisted.

[BartSimpson]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

No the people of Iran do not love America. I know plenty of them. If anything they somewhat sympathize with having rulers that embarrass them.

But Iranians remember the 1953 coup, the support for Saddam, and the shooting down of a civilian aircraft by US forces. They want freedom but know that the US is not their friend.

The ones I met in Tehran were decidedly pro-American. They disliked old man Bush because of his ties to the CIA but they were still adamantly pro-American.

[N_Fiddledog]

$1:

Heroic Women Fighting for Freedom


Take note, those of you who want to see real women freedom-fighters. Look into the streets of Iran or listen to the chess champion Anna Muzychuk.

Iranian women, by risking their lives, have unmasked the faces of those trying to promote burqas and hijabs as supposed "symbols of liberation".

The desperate attempt of Iranian people pouring out onto the streets against the Islamist regime exposes the bitter life that Iran's citizens, especially women, have been forced to live for nearly forty years in the name of Islamic law, (sharia).

These demonstrations have also shown the ugly face of Islamists who take their own people hostage to quench their thirst for power -- by repression, jail, torture, executions -- any way they can.

Iranian women, like many others, are sick and tired of living in layers upon layers of imprisonment.

The regime in Iran clearly feels shaken by the resolve of these protestors: Iran's leaders have promised to soften their misogynistic laws by not imprisoning women in Tehran who appear in public without their veils on.

The protesters, however, do not seem to be buying this offer: they are seeking the full elimination of extremism in the country. There is clearly no more trust in the promises of this regime.

The skeptics, in fact, are right. There is a catch. Although the regime announced that it would not arrest women who set aside Iran's strict dress code, the regime also stated that these women would have to attend special "morality classes" by the sharia police.

Now why would a regime want that? Could it be so that the regime can document these women to keep a watch on them?

The shackles Iranians are trying to break are exactly the same ones that organizations such as CAIR, and cohorts of Islamist regimes such as Linda Sarsour, have been trying to sell to the Western public as symbols of "fashion" and "liberation".

Such apologists simply serve as mouthpieces for these extremist regimes, which not only enslave their own people but also distort the economic and intellectual development of their people through a mindset of supremacy and hatred throughout global arena.

When the organizers of the Women's March in the U.S. cherry-picked "abuses," they left a vast number of women behind, unnoticed and unwelcome, who have been subjected to inhuman treatment for centuries.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1165 ... eedom-iran

[N_Fiddledog]

$1:

Months before the protests that are shaking the Islamic Republic of Iran began, President Trump stood before the entire world at the United Nations and boldly declared that the terror regime would fall.

“The good people of Iran want change, and, other than the vast military power of the United States, Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most,” he correctly predicted.

As another day of protests begins, as the Islamist thugs of the IRGC face a choice between an outraged populace and a failing regime, his words in that September speech ring truer than ever.

“The longest-suffering victims of Iran’s leaders are, in fact, its own people,” he pointed out...

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268900 ... greenfield

[Zipperfish]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

The ones I met in Tehran were decidedly pro-American. They disliked old man Bush because of his ties to the CIA but they were still adamantly pro-American.

They were probably being polite, or sensed your violently anti-Muslim views and said what you wanted to hear in order to extricate themselves from further conversation.

[N_Fiddledog]

Demonstrators face the DEATH PENALTY as nine die overnight and 450 have been arrested

$1:

After days of unrest that have seen 21 people killed and more than 450 arrested, the US President said Iranians were 'finally acting'.

'All of the money that President Obama so foolishly gave them went into terrorism and into their 'pockets.' The people have little food, big inflation and no human rights. The U.S. is watching!' he wrote this morning.

Iran's foreign ministry hit back saying Trump should focus on 'homeless and hungry people' in his own country rather than insulting Iranians.

'Instead of wasting his time sending useless and insulting tweets regarding other countries, he would be better off seeing to the domestic issues of his own country such as daily killings of dozens of people... and the existence of millions of homeless and hungry people,' said ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi.

It comes after nine people died in overnight clashes and the head of Tehran's Revolutionary Court reportedly warned detained protesters could be executed.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z534IQgPgI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Thanos]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Thanos Thanos:

Maybe if the endless train wreck of the great tweeting orange dickbag's clown show antics wasn't a constant ratings-grabbing distraction the media would pay more attention to what's going on. Then again if the new regime's policy is telling everyone else on the planet to fuck off and hyuck-hyuck-'Murika First! why should the media or viewers take overseas news seriously at all when the cretin at the top of the food chain isn't?

You're not seeing what's happening here, are you? Obama never said diddly shit about the Iranian mullahs fucking over and oppressing their own people. Quite to the contrary he gave them $150 billion towards their nuclear program.

The reason these people feel empowered to risk their lives to stand up against the regime in Tehran is precisely because there's right now an American President who not only isn't "siding with the Muslims" (meaning the crazies) he's standing up to the fuckers and that emboldens the secular, progressive, freedom-loving types of people I thought you supported.

Someone should tell them that if he`s not all that interested in helping Americans five hundred miles away in Puerto Rico then it`s unlikely he`s interested in helping foreign demon Muslims ten thousand miles away.

I support freedom that leads to a better world. I don`t support chaos that leads to more death and tragedy. That`s the difference between you and I these days.

[ShepherdsDog]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Demonstrators face the DEATH PENALTY as nine die overnight and 450 have been arrested

$1:

After days of unrest that have seen 21 people killed and more than 450 arrested, the US President said Iranians were 'finally acting'.

'All of the money that President Obama so foolishly gave them went into terrorism and into their 'pockets.' The people have little food, big inflation and no human rights. The U.S. is watching!' he wrote this morning.

Iran's foreign ministry hit back saying Trump should focus on 'homeless and hungry people' in his own country rather than insulting Iranians.

'Instead of wasting his time sending useless and insulting tweets regarding other countries, he would be better off seeing to the domestic issues of his own country such as daily killings of dozens of people... and the existence of millions of homeless and hungry people,' said ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi.

It comes after nine people died in overnight clashes and the head of Tehran's Revolutionary Court reportedly warned detained protesters could be executed.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z534IQgPgI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Suddenly Trump has found some love and admiration in his heart for the Mullahs.

[N_Fiddledog]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Demonstrators face the DEATH PENALTY as nine die overnight and 450 have been arrested

$1:

After days of unrest that have seen 21 people killed and more than 450 arrested, the US President said Iranians were 'finally acting'.

'All of the money that President Obama so foolishly gave them went into terrorism and into their 'pockets.' The people have little food, big inflation and no human rights. The U.S. is watching!' he wrote this morning.

Iran's foreign ministry hit back saying Trump should focus on 'homeless and hungry people' in his own country rather than insulting Iranians.

'Instead of wasting his time sending useless and insulting tweets regarding other countries, he would be better off seeing to the domestic issues of his own country such as daily killings of dozens of people... and the existence of millions of homeless and hungry people,' said ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi.

It comes after nine people died in overnight clashes and the head of Tehran's Revolutionary Court reportedly warned detained protesters could be executed.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z534IQgPgI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Suddenly Trump has found some love and admiration in his heart for the Mullahs.

Say what?

How would you come to that wacky conclusion?

The only thing I can think of is you might be taking seriously the rhetorical agitprop of Iranian ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi.

In which wouldn't it be you who's "found some love and admiration in his heart for the Mullahs?"