news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

COVID-19 a 'failure of early warning' for Canad

Canadian Content
18130news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

COVID-19 a 'failure of early warning' for Canada, intelligence expert says | CTV News


Political | 181295 hits | Apr 13 8:55 am | Posted by: uwish
24 Comment

It was last on a list of eight threat scenarios, but the danger of a global pandemic made the cut when the Liberal government issued a national security policy in 2004.

Comments

  1. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:04 pm
    So how is it a failure when we have one of the lowest infection rates in the G7? Alberta has one of th elowest infections rates, possibly in the world? This is a failure?

  2. by avatar stratos
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:06 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    So how is it a failure when we have one of the lowest infection rates in the G7? Alberta has one of th elowest infections rates, possibly in the world? This is a failure?



    You failing to keep up with the rest of the world. Canada is full of slackers. :P

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:08 pm
    Yea, we can't even be bothered to get up off the couch. I've been wearing sweatpants for almost a month!

  4. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:14 pm
    We were saved by our geography. If we had reacted sooner one might even be able to go
    get a haircut today.

  5. by avatar raydan
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:26 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Yea, we can't even be bothered to get up off the couch. I've been wearing sweatpants for almost a month!

    I have daytime pyjamas and night-time pyjamas.

  6. by avatar raydan
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:27 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    We were saved by our geography. If we had reacted sooner one might even be able to go get a haircut today.

    I look like Grizzly Adams now.

  7. by avatar herbie
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:43 pm
    Of course we could've reacted a little quicker. But things went from "hmm" to "oh sit!" pretty goddam fast here.

  8. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:54 pm
    "raydan" said
    We were saved by our geography. If we had reacted sooner one might even be able to go get a haircut today.

    I look like Grizzly Adams now.

    Same! But I own clippers, so that is by choice. :)

    And, as usual he's wrong. Unless symptoms present as soon as you catch a pathogen, there will always be the time needed for someone to cross borders and start spreading a new virus. This is how pathogens evolve. By the time it's caught, it's already wild in the population. All that can be done is mitigate that spread through testing for the disease, if there is a test. And by isolating everyone who is vulnerable to it.

  9. by avatar Public_Domain
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:02 pm
    "N_Fiddledog" said
    We were saved by our geography. If we had reacted sooner one might even be able to go
    get a haircut today.

    really hurting for that trim, eh? :lol:

  10. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:08 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    [
    And, as usual he's wrong.


    You're wrong about that, of course. But what else is new. If you weren't the one who was always shown to be wrong you wouldn't have to hide.

    There's a reason they call New York the "epicenter" of the American spread.

    The disease spreads out from the larger population centers. If you have time you can slow the spread. A well spread out geography gives you time.

    The first old folks home was hit in Vancouver. This makes sense. It's on the other side of the Pacific from China. Then it spread. We didn't hear about the major spread in Toronto until a week or more after the freakout in North Vancouver. There was time to freak out in the broader Canada. After Toronto it spread everywhere, but slower because there are less people per kilometre.

    That's what we call common sense.

    And if it wasn't geography, what was it? Show me these miraculous interventions of the Trudeau regime that no other country thought of. Why was Trump ahead of Canada on almost every maneuver to combat the spread?

    Oh wait, you can't reply, right? Because you have to pretend you didn't read this.

  11. by avatar Scape
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:12 pm
    There was a 2 month lag that was unacceptable and when the after action report is done on this heads will roll.

    The key culprit is that we are relying way to much on external players acting in good faith such as and not limited to the WHO, the CDC and the US.

  12. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:51 pm
    Hey, any know-it-all experts on "The Science" out there? You know...the guys who tell you computer models can predict the future and that's "The Science." I know one, but he won't see this and that's too bad because he gets to run around claiming he's right when he's wrong.

    Scape posted an interesting graph of statistics on another thread.

    https://www.covid-19canada.com/

    I can't help noticing the highest death rates (deaths per hundred, let's say) are in provinces with areas of the highest population density.

    That can't be, of course, because I just heard a Doctor of some strange perversion of reality he calls "The Science" tell me population density has no effect on the speed and likelihood of the spread of the virus.

    Coincidence, I guess.

  13. by avatar Scape
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:56 pm
    Or testing and the lack thereof maybe?

  14. by avatar N_Fiddledog
    Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:01 pm
    "Scape" said
    Or testing and the lack thereof maybe?


    Do you mean it might take a while longer or never happen in a less concentrated population per square kilometer or a more densely concentrated population?

    What are the mechanics of this hypothesis?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

Advertise


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2023 by Canadaka.net