| Author |
Message |
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| Waaa Waaa Waaa..... Welcome to the club! Where the hell do you think most of the money Ontario puts in the coffers has been going all these years!!!! I was in the army for 15 years, and except for the time in Germany, I was posted in out west in Winnipeg, and loved it there. But I couldn't believe ... |
|
 |
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:08 am
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| I may be in shilo but I'm from Red Deer and that is where my house is going to be built when I get home from Afghanistan. I tell you that I'm begining to get tired of the BS coming out of ottawa about "western aileanation". Ottawa and the Liberal party of Canada are talking about BC, Sask. & MB... |
|
|
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 1:10 am
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| Monorprise: You should study up on the origins of Communism and you would realise that Marx & Engles started their writings in the 1830's not to mention that before that the chruch of Jerusalem (the Second Crusade) was trying to employ many of the "Values" of communism. The star thing is just a... |
|
|
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:39 am
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| You don't hear Americans trying to seperate because it says in their constitution that they can't seperate. While it doesn’t actual say that in the Constitution, the US constitution does give the federal government the right to suppress insurrection(much the same as your government has historically... |
|
|
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| Actually I have to agree with Monodork. I don't see any U.S state doing any of this S*!t that Canada is doing. Quebec whineyness, Albertan arrogance, Ontarians being high and mighty asses. We need a solidified Canada. By the way, that is one ugly flag. Nice originalness of having a star on it..remi... |
|
|
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:38 pm
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| That says everything about how Ottawa treats us Albertans. So why do you say with them? Why not just ditch the socialist bastards and go the Texas way? I can’t imagine any us state putting up with such garbage, I mean words and treatment is one thing, unfair economic exploitation, and abuses, that’... |
|
|
Forum: Alberta Topic: Sorry Alberta |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 31
Views: 1796
|
| That says everything about how Ottawa treats us Albertans. So why do you say with them? Why not just ditch the socialist bastards and go the Texas way? I can’t imagine any us state putting up with such garbage, I mean words and treatment is one thing, unfair economic exploitation, and abuses, that’... |
|
|
Forum: US Politics Topic: U.S. Senate backs oil drilling in Alaskan refuge |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:08 am
|
|
Replies: 204
Views: 2381
|
| CTV.ca News Staff A proposal that would have protected the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil drilling has been voted down by the U.S. Senate. An amendment brought forth by Democrat Senator Maria Cantwell proposed killing plans to open up the Alaska wilderness to drilling. However, it was vot... |
|
|
Forum: Improve Canada! Topic: The Canadian Dictatorship |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 353
|
| Our leaders don't want to know what we think By Ted Byfield In Washington, the Republican president's nominee for the Supreme Court came under such scrutiny from Republican senators that she withdrew. Their complaint: She was not conservative enough. It was a major embarrassment to the Bush adminis... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: second US civil war? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 3:01 am
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 883
|
| The north were more wealthy and more modernized with steam factories and labour force (not slaves) who actually get paid. In contrast to the South with the Aristocratic land-owners with the old system of slaves which plain didn't work in the rapidly modernized world. Not to discredit the South whic... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: second US civil war? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:29 am
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 883
|
| I just realized that the United States is still fissured along religious lines. The northern US is still much less religious than the southern US. Some time from now these states will separate between religious lines, and I think it will be ugly... what do you guys think? I think that’s a little bi... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: There'll Always Be an England -- Or Will There? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:34 pm
|
|
Replies: 217
Views: 2515
|
| Like you had indicated they are part of our heritage at that point as a people(Civilization) (US and Canada). We are the sons of Brittan that came to live in North America, culturally form that point, from that point forward our history and identity as a peoples (USA and Canada and the British/Europ... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: There'll Always Be an England -- Or Will There? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:00 pm
|
|
Replies: 217
Views: 2515
|
| Fine I understood you statement as to meaning that a primary goal of the Americans was conquer and keep perminantly the territory of British North America. If i was just merely misuderstanding the meaning of conquer than this whole debate could probably be dropped now. AS far as the people living i... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: There'll Always Be an England -- Or Will There? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 217
Views: 2515
|
| Yes but that was not the goal of the war it self, it was a tactically necessary objective to the conflict, to try and prevent the British from marching troops in directly. So in a real sense it really wasn’t to “Conquer British North America” as that objective didn’t included the need to hold on to... |
|
|
Forum: International Politics Topic: There'll Always Be an England -- Or Will There? |
| Monorprise |
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:22 pm
|
|
Replies: 217
Views: 2515
|
| Fine I understood you statement as to meaning that a primary goal of the Americans was conquer and keep perminantly the territory of British North America. If i was just merely misuderstanding the meaning of conquer than this whole debate could probably be dropped now. Yes but that was not the goal... |
|
|
| Sort by: |
