And since we were talking about the SCC being politically correct. How about this bullshit?
$1:
"The issue for determination in this matter is not whether the complainant was drinking on a given day but rather whether (the employer) made reasonable efforts to accommodate the complainant as soon as it was aware that she had a disability and special needs associated with that disability," Walsh wrote.
So now being an alcoholic is reason for your employer to accommodate the drunken binges that likely interfered with your job and got your fired.
I guess every addiction is now an disability that requires accommodation.
I wait with bated breath for drunken bus drivers, coked up surgeons etcetera etcetera, hell the list is endless. Let's just accommodate everyone no matter if they're capable of doing the job safely or not.