CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1734
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:07 am
 


kenmore kenmore:
I am heading to the anti prorogation rally here shortly. They are expecting thousands.. so you are not the only disappointed CPC voter. There are 3 of them on the committee that arranged the rally here.


But....it isn't an anti-prorgation rally. It's an anti-Harper rally. If it was an "anti-progation" rally it would be against the practice, rule and concept of prorogation and would be demanding we change the rules surrounding it.


Has anyone stood up and said, "Let just limit proroges to this set of circumstances by way of law and then we can make sure no one does this in the future"? No. So it's not an anti-prorgue rally. Because you can bet your bottom dollar that Iggy and the Liberals wanna keep the possibility open for them to do exactly the same thing in 4-5 years.

You gonna be at a rally when that happens? I sincerely doubt it.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1734
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:28 am
 


Parliament Hill....

"Protest Cam"....live shots of the Hill. We can watch the protest develop. Maybe try and do our own head counts. :)


tp://www.parliamenthill.gc.ca/text/camera-eng.html


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:33 am
 


$1:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking to his caucus on Parliament Hill, says "Canada is safer, stronger and better off" after four years of Conservative rule.




Of course he said that..........





Nobody else could be convinced to say it!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:04 am
 


commanderkai commanderkai:
Agreed with Jeff and Fiddle


Agreed with the three of ya. I've been reasonably happy with Harper and I think he's made some progress. Not happy with the stimulus, nor this last prorogation. I'm warming to leaving Afghanistan if only to progress on the capital expenditures that have gone nowhere and to cease the fiscal hemorage in the defence budget. I'm still not sure about a majority though.

Any supporters out there ready for a majority?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:35 pm
 


Personally, I'm more pissed at my provincial government than my federal one. Federally, it's choosing the lesser of 2 evils. Provincially, for me, it's Stan Marsh's, South Park dilemma of choosing between a giant douche, and a turd sandwich.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7580
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:39 pm
 


Akhenaten Akhenaten:
kenmore kenmore:
I am heading to the anti prorogation rally here shortly. They are expecting thousands.. so you are not the only disappointed CPC voter. There are 3 of them on the committee that arranged the rally here.


But....it isn't an anti-prorgation rally. It's an anti-Harper rally. If it was an "anti-progation" rally it would be against the practice, rule and concept of prorogation and would be demanding we change the rules surrounding it.


Has anyone stood up and said, "Let just limit proroges to this set of circumstances by way of law and then we can make sure no one does this in the future"? No. So it's not an anti-prorgue rally. Because you can bet your bottom dollar that Iggy and the Liberals wanna keep the possibility open for them to do exactly the same thing in 4-5 years.

You gonna be at a rally when that happens? I sincerely doubt it.


There were thousands at the rally,, most just wanting harper to get back to work. There were lots of signs saying to vote him out though, there are loads of people ( torys as well) that want and end to him..


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1261
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:03 pm
 


Satisfied with Harper and the CPC, and that as a Quebecer.

Only putting this out there since many in the ROC automatically assume that everyone here supports the Bloc or whatever. :)

And with some comments that I have seen from some QC Liberal and Bloc politicians in the media as of late, that even corraborates CPC support. And now having said that, Harper owes me a beer. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:11 pm
 


N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Personally, I'm more pissed at my provincial government than my federal one. Federally, it's choosing the lesser of 2 evils. Provincially, for me, it's Stan Marsh's, South Park dilemma of choosing between a giant douche, and a turd sandwich.


I'm very pissed with Campbell - between the excessively expensive olympics, stealthy arrival of the HST, and the majority of stimulus spending going into metro Vancouver not to mention the coming layoffs of government underlings while MLAs enjoy their fat bonuses, and there is they exceedingly disgusted part of me that is looking at Carol James and deciding I might have to fight the automatic cringe response.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1092
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:13 am
 


At least you voted these govts in Sellinger is to be that yet. So far he is better then Mcfayden , who has never got past the bring the Jets back comment .


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:00 am
 


Gunnair Gunnair:
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Personally, I'm more pissed at my provincial government than my federal one. Federally, it's choosing the lesser of 2 evils. Provincially, for me, it's Stan Marsh's, South Park dilemma of choosing between a giant douche, and a turd sandwich.


I'm very pissed with Campbell - between the excessively expensive olympics, stealthy arrival of the HST, and the majority of stimulus spending going into metro Vancouver not to mention the coming layoffs of government underlings while MLAs enjoy their fat bonuses, and there is they exceedingly disgusted part of me that is looking at Carol James and deciding I might have to fight the automatic cringe response.


I here ya, but federally for me it's easy. It's one issue. Energy. As long as Obama remains a lame duck president in the US we're not going to get Cap and trade in Canada with Harper. Obama's continued uselessness is a safe bet.

Provincially, in BC, one's brainwashed on that issue, and the other sees personal advantage. Neither mindset works for me.

Federally, energy stupidity is the final push down the hill from which there is no recovery.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:22 am
 


I don't know about better off.

We're deeper in deficit than ever before, but the global recession really isn't Harper's fault. If Layton or Iggy was in office, I don't think they could do any better with the economy than Harper has done (which is so-so IMHO). His biggest mistake was cutting the GST while the economy was booming. Had he waited until the economy faltered, I think we'd be better off financially.

I think some countries (like the US and UK) might have more respect for us, but it's still a far cry from back in the 50s, when we were considered a go-to guy in world affairs. I think their genral opinion is that we're not a laughingstock any more. How much of that has to do with Harper is debatable, as it was 9/11 that really got defence spending ramped up again, not Harper getting elected (especially given all the defence promises he's backpedaled on in the past year and a half).

I think Harper's use of prorogue, while not unprecedented by a PM, is a warping of the intent behind its use. Where other PMs have used it to give them Parliament an unnecessary vacation, Harper has used it to stifle the opposition on not one, but two separate occasions, which I find a highly disturbing use of power.

In general, I don't think we're any better off (or worse) with Harper at the helm. He's done an average job of running the country, but I don't see it as exemplary in any fashion.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1261
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:56 am
 


bootlegga bootlegga:


We're deeper in deficit than ever before, but the global recession really isn't Harper's fault. If Layton or Iggy was in office, I don't think they could do any better with the economy than Harper has done


Nice comment there Bootlegga.

A good way to recognize that no matter who had been in charge, they could have not done much better.

The ironic thing is, that some months ago, Harper got criticized also about his stimilus package, how it was not enough. Now, these same people blame him for the deficit.


Last edited by PimpBrewski123 on Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2271
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:56 am
 


I have to agree with fiddledog again on the provincial pissing me off versus federal. I can't believe right now in Saskatchewan they are trying to push a nuclear reactor on us like it will somehow solve a million problems.

We are in freaking Saskatchewan. We have a TON of rivers and wind. It doesn't take a scientist to realize that natural power could be a huge success here. Instead they want to go the route that would put billions of dollars in debt on the province and make us have to deal with waste problems when the rest of the world is moving away from nuclear power.

So they decide to make a council for recommendations and over half the members on the council have at some point been on the payroll for Bruce power the very company trying to push the reactor.

Grrrrrr.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:04 pm
 


PimpBrewski123 PimpBrewski123:
bootlegga bootlegga:


We're deeper in deficit than ever before, but the global recession really isn't Harper's fault. If Layton or Iggy was in office, I don't think they could do any better with the economy than Harper has done


Nice comment there Bootlegga.

A good way to recognize that no matter who had been in charge, they could have not done much better.

The ironic thing is, that some months ago, Harper got criticized also about his stimilus package, how it was not enough. Now, these same people blame him for the deficit.


That's true, but I think the criticism was in how he spent the stimulus, not that it was spent. I think the Liberals and NDP would have preferred more for the average Joe than all those massive corporate bail-outs. I also think that both of them (Liberals and NDP) fully expected a big deficit, but not as big as Harper has produced. Still, no matter how you slice it, it will always be Harper's deficit, just like it was Trudeau's and Mulroney's.

Just my two cents on the deficit.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:12 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
PimpBrewski123 PimpBrewski123:
bootlegga bootlegga:


We're deeper in deficit than ever before, but the global recession really isn't Harper's fault. If Layton or Iggy was in office, I don't think they could do any better with the economy than Harper has done


Nice comment there Bootlegga.

A good way to recognize that no matter who had been in charge, they could have not done much better.

The ironic thing is, that some months ago, Harper got criticized also about his stimilus package, how it was not enough. Now, these same people blame him for the deficit.


That's true, but I think the criticism was in how he spent the stimulus, not that it was spent. I think the Liberals and NDP would have preferred more for the average Joe than all those massive corporate bail-outs. I also think that both of them (Liberals and NDP) fully expected a big deficit, but not as big as Harper has produced. Still, no matter how you slice it, it will always be Harper's deficit, just like it was Trudeau's and Mulroney's.

Just my two cents on the deficit.


I certainly wonder at that. Layten is big union, and I'd be surprised if he turned his back on the CAW and let the companies die.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.