[PublicAnimalNo9]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Soooo you all were fine with having your every movement tracked when it was private enterprise but you draw the line at the govt doing it?

Assumes facts not in evidence.

What assumption? It's called a question. Note the funny little question mark looking thing at the end of the sentence.

[DrCaleb]

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Soooo you all were fine with having your every movement tracked when it was private enterprise but you draw the line at the govt doing it?

Assumes facts not in evidence.

What assumption? It's called a question. Note the funny little question mark looking thing at the end of the sentence.

"Soooo you all were fine with having your every movement tracked when it was private enterprise " is an assumption. No one I know agreed to that, or was OK with it.

[herbie]

I thought you were referring to the data itself.
Delivering the data that 532 cell users are at Our Lady Of Endless Suffering @ 123 4th St is one thing.
Yet everyone's assuming they're delivering a list of 532 names, home addresses, phone numbers, SINs and VISA numbers.
Yeah, that's what would be an invasion of your privacy. The former would not.

[DrCaleb]

herbie herbie:

I thought you were referring to the data itself.
Delivering the data that 532 cell users are at Our Lady Of Endless Suffering @ 123 4th St is one thing.
Yet everyone's assuming they're delivering a list of 532 names, home addresses, phone numbers, SINs and VISA numbers.
Yeah, that's what would be an invasion of your privacy. The former would not.

Delivering the location of groups of people violates their right to freely associate. (which I wrote earlier, is allowed in emergencies).

But, what about after? It's not like it's difficult.

https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... -weakness/